King Pietersen
International Captain
The Aussies are walking off. This is brilliant.
I'm not saying Clarke's innings was better than Dave Hussey's. It wasn't, because Hussey went on with it. I'm responding more to the suggestions that Clarke getting out was a blessing for Australia when at the time he really wasn't playing too badly.You're just refusing to appreciate that T20 is different from ODIs.
And Dave Hussey went on with his score. Sure didn't go huge, but whenClarke falls, if White doesn't do what he does, Aust lose! Dave's score wasn't great, but comnsdiering he didn't run someone out, nor force himself to come in at 3 when he shouldn't, I'd say Clarke's was far worse.
Ha, yep. Amatuerish.This is an aspect of cricket that is worse than just about every other major international sport in the world.
How do you justify your point when Australia's batting success went up almost immediately after Clarke went out?I'm not saying Clarke's innings was better than Dave Hussey's. It wasn't, because Hussey went on with it. I'm responding more to the suggestions that Clarke getting out was a blessing for Australia when at the time he really wasn't playing too badly.
A run a ball 27 under the circumstances was not a bad innings, in 20/20. If he'd batted the rest of the innings and not upped the scoring rate at all, it'd just have been about equivalent to Dussey's innings, which was decent enough. It wasn't a bad start though, better than Hussey's, and acting as though he was hurting the team by playing that way is silly.
It'd have been different if he'd come in at 1/100 after 12 overs of course.
It's supposition, obviously, but I doubt he'd have played the innings White did after he exited.I'm not saying Clarke's innings was better than Dave Hussey's. It wasn't, because Hussey went on with it. I'm responding more to the suggestions that Clarke getting out was a blessing for Australia when at the time he really wasn't playing too badly.
A run a ball 27 under the circumstances was not a bad innings, in 20/20. If he'd batted the rest of the innings and not upped the scoring rate at all, it'd just have been about equivalent to Dussey's innings, which was decent enough. It wasn't a bad start though, better than Hussey's, and acting as though he was hurting the team by playing that way is silly.
It'd have been different if he'd come in at 1/100 after 12 overs of course.
Because Dussey and Clarke were both turning the strike without either taking on the boundary hitter role. If Dussey got out at the same time you'd have seen the same thing.How do you justify your point when Australia's batting success went up almost immediately after Clarke went out?
White played well? Not sure what you're looking for here. Clarke's innings under the circumstances wasn't bad, and he wasn't hurting the team by scoring at a run a ball, that's what I'm saying. Obviously White could have played an amazing innings or he could have gotten out for a duck, that really has no bearing on the way Clarke played.How do you justify your point when Australia's batting success went up almost immediately after Clarke went out?