FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
Reeeeally don't think Clarke's innings was that bad.
I know he's an easy target when it comes to 20/20 but if you want to blame someone for the lack of momentum in the first 10 overs, you can blame the three wickets and Dussey more than Clarke. 27 at a run a ball when the team run rate was 4 and three early wickets fell is acceptable, and if David Hussey had done that and then kicked on it would have been an excellent innings, instead of taking 40 odd balls to reach the same score.
Who knows what we'd have finished with if he hadn't come in.
Anyway, slightly below par, England should win. Never know with Australia in a final though.
I know he's an easy target when it comes to 20/20 but if you want to blame someone for the lack of momentum in the first 10 overs, you can blame the three wickets and Dussey more than Clarke. 27 at a run a ball when the team run rate was 4 and three early wickets fell is acceptable, and if David Hussey had done that and then kicked on it would have been an excellent innings, instead of taking 40 odd balls to reach the same score.
Who knows what we'd have finished with if he hadn't come in.
Anyway, slightly below par, England should win. Never know with Australia in a final though.