I think some of the younger lot are much closer to their original ages especially those who have come through age level competitions.Could anyone give me a heads-up as to whether Mohammed Aamir is actually 17 or not? I know that the ages given by the PCB aren't always 100% accurate, but if they are, then he is a seriously good bowler for a 17 year-old. Stick him in our u-17s league and you could guarantee he'd get 9 or more wickets every game.
PCB doesn't lie about ages, it's their policy to select players under 23, which forces these youngsters to cheatI think some of the younger lot are much closer to their original ages especially those who have come through age level competitions.
yeah i was worried about them pannicing agian, but really they said before final that they will not make mistakes like they did against India. in 2007 indians were mentally more strong, this time it was out turnCongratulation Pakistan!!
For me, it's like you have taken the Cup back from India to whom you had gifted it, last time. So, it's just poetic justice that Pakistan should win this time. It's also the best thing to boost the morale of both the team and the people of Pakistan.
ThanksCongratulations. Wow look at those celebrations .Definitely much needed victory is this. Hope this will give a huge boost for the team .After all what is the fun in the cricket world without fired up Pakistan team.
I don't agree in tests. Warnapura and Paranavithana should be tried for some time.Dilshan = Jayasuriya's replacement at the top in all formats.
Striking power will come from Maharoof. Don't we want our best batsmen playing most of the overs? And people like Tharanga and Udawatta are jokes against good pace. Let Dilshan bash and Matthew consolidate. When Matthews is in he'll be a bitter experience for the bowlers- Matthews is a find. I don't agree with Migara about him opening - we need his striking at the death for sure. He should be batting 5 or 6.
At least he won a match for us. I prefer him for no hopers like Kapugedara or SIlva who crack under pressure. He's more suited for 50 over format, a player who can consolidate. I would still keep himMubarak is still greatest joke played on international cricket. I still think I'm going to wake up one morning and find out that it was all a dream and Jehan Mubarak was a figment of my imagination.
Agreed.Silva = done. I thought 20/20 would be the elixer to cure on of our most promising talents. What the hell happened to this guy?
Have been telling this always, that he needs to make the off break his stock ball. I think his finger is wearing off. With the off break he can learn all the tricks of a finger spinner. Batsmen will be weary of the carrom ball and will be glued to the crease unlike playing an orthadox offspinnerMendis needs to come up with some new questions to ask batsmen. Pakistan showed they've got all the answer to what he's got now. He needs also bowl the offspinner more.
Agreed, but he was injured I am afraid.Udana's selection as an all arounder is a diabolical. The guy is not a batsmen. His bowling in 20/20 will be quite handy as he gains more experiance. But ideally Maharoof should have been in the side - we missed the bounce and variation he brings to the attack.
Yes! Needs Dhammika Prasad to be fit an firing. With Vaas, Matthews, Maharoof, Kulasekara and Thushara, SL fast attack will be some heck of a thing.Malinga is back!
Your right - maybe I'm a little carried away in my TilDil love but I think he'd do a great job at the top. Warnapura is good and I still like Varndort should he rediscover his resolve. I haven't seen enough of Paranavithana to have a strong opinion.I don't agree in tests. Warnapura and Paranavithana should be tried for some time.
I suppose thats once school of thought. But our achilles heel has been lower order striking. The last 10 overs are just as important as the first 10-15. If you look at the really strong sides, even when their top order fails, they have players who come in at 5 and 6 that can swing the match back into their favor. Maharoof is an ok striker but we've been waiting for him to come good as a consistent striker for some time - he still hasn't delivered. He'll be a Akram or Pollock style batsmen who can play but not one you'd want to back to come good in a tight stop.Striking power will come from Maharoof. Don't we want our best batsmen playing most of the overs? And people like Tharanga and Udawatta are jokes against good pace. Let Dilshan bash and Matthew consolidate. When Matthews is in he'll be a bitter experience for the bowlers
I'd prefer Kapu or Silva over Mubarak, which isn't saying much! I just think both of those players have so much more talent and potential. Mubarak will never be anything more than what he is - a domestic cricketer who for some odd reason has more lives than any SL cricketer in recent memory. But I think there are other players who deserve to have an opportunity now ahead of all three of these guys.At least he won a match for us. I prefer him for no hopers like Kapugedara or SIlva who crack under pressure. He's more suited for 50 over format, a player who can consolidate. I would still keep him
Definitely. Lets hope he and our coaching staff are leading him down this path!Have been telling this always, that he needs to make the off break his stock ball. I think his finger is wearing off. With the off break he can learn all the tricks of a finger spinner. Batsmen will be weary of the carrom ball and will be glued to the crease unlike playing an orthadox offspinner
Whats happened to Chanaka Welegedara? I was him a few years ago and now he's nowhere to be seen in the national set-up. He was easily the best self arm swing bowler I've seen in a SL side since Vaas. He has decent pace too, up over 140km and accurate. If I remember correctly he was a product of the MRF Pace Academy to boot. He performed impressively against a strong side in England too. I don't understand how he's not in the mix.anymore.Yes! Needs Dhammika Prasad to be fit an firing. With Vaas, Matthews, Maharoof, Kulasekara and Thushara, SL fast attack will be some heck of a thing.