• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Sachin Tendulkar vs Brian Lara

Who was the better test batsman?


  • Total voters
    64

halba

International Debutant
Both Warne & Murali were poor in India

Tests : 34 wickets in 9 Tests @ 43. 1 5-Fer

ODIs(vs India) : 7 wickets in 8 ODIs @ 52.

Tests : 40 wickets in 11 Tests @ 45. 2 5-Fer.

ODIs(vs India) : 15 wickets in 14 ODIs @ 35.
The main reason, is that Indian batters back then were extremely great players of spin. Especially in home conditions. Players like Sachin, Dravid and VVS of course the top 3 but mostly everyone could play spin easily.

Teams like england and south Africa, windies were completely bamboozled by spin in all conditions. They never really got on top of Warne or Murali. The only time they did was Lara and when KP or Kallis slogged Warne. Those 3 out of the entire teams could only pick Warne.
 
Last edited:

Fanboy375

School Boy/Girl Captain
The main reason, is that Indian batters back then were extremely great players of spin. Especially in home conditions. Players like Sachin, Dravid and VVS of course the top 3 but mostly everyone could play spin easily.

Teams like england and south Africa, windies were completely bamboozled by spin in all conditions. They never really got on top of Warne or Murali. The only time they did was Lara and when KP or Kallis slogged Warne. Those 3 out of the entire teams could only pick Warne.
If Sachin was amazing player of spin than why does his home vs away record so different than others.Should he have better ave in home.But it seems he unlike Lara doesn't show home ground advantage
 

Fanboy375

School Boy/Girl Captain
I think that probably won't go to good as well as he debuted as a 16 year old..... I think somewhere from his 30th Test to his 160th would be an interesting comparison.
I know he ave 58 from age 20 to 37.We don't know what Lara would ave if he played from age 16 to age 39
 

Fanboy375

School Boy/Girl Captain
Below is Tendulkar and Lara at 131 Test matches. Why 131? Because that was Lara's final tally when he retired.

For Tendulkar, the stats in brackets is what he ended up with when he retired.

Tendulkar
Innings: 209 (329)
Runs: 10434 (15,921)
Average Runs Per Innings: 55.80 (53.78)
Average Runs Per Match: 79.64 (79.60)
Not Outs: 22 (33)
Ducks: 8 (14)
50s: 40 (68)
100s: 35 (51)
50+ Scores: 75 (119)
150+ Scores: 15 (20)
200+ Scores: 4 (6)
300+ Scores: 0 (0)
1000+ Runs in Year: 4 times (6)
Most Runs in Year: 1392, 2002 (1562, 2010)
Highest Score: 248* (248*)


Lara
Innings: 232
Runs: 11953
Average Runs Per Innings: 52.88
Average Runs Per Match: 91.24
Not Outs: 6
Ducks: 17
50s: 48
100s: 34
50+ Scores: 82
150+ Scores: 19
200+ Scores: 9
300+ Scores: 2
1000+ Runs in Calendar Year: 5 times
Most Runs in Calendar Year: 1344 (2003)
Highest Score: 400 Not Out
One also need to be considered that what if Lara played same teams as Sachin did and vice versa.Like Lara played too much vs Eng and Sachin played too much vs NZ.Eng bowling was better than NZ.
 

Coronis

International Coach
The late 90s attack which had Cairns, Doull, Nash was fine. Not amazing bowlers but quite good for home conditions. They were much worse in the 2000s (whenever Bond was injured) because all they had were Chris Martin, O'Brein, Franklin, etc. who were all terrible.
Chris Martin underrated.

90s NZ bowling was laughable
Wouldn’t that make a poor performance against them worse?
 

Top