Coronis
International Coach
I feel in an all time great team a four pronged pace attack would not be a wrong choice even it is unpopular
This probably gets overlooked far more than it should. imo its a big reason WI had so many more draws than Aus. I made a post on their win rate in games where Roger Harper (the best spinner they had then) played vs when he didn’t. iirc far less draws, similar loss rate increased win rate.The counter would be that the marginal return of a fourth pacer to deliver more after the three worldclass pacers is less than the spinner doing the tasks of those scenarios when it works to their strength (marathon spells, overrate issue, spinning wickets or 3rd/4th innings performances).
And it's not like all ATG bats were great against spin.
If you’re bowling 10-15 less overs a day, whats the point of having a bowler who might strike slightly faster? And most likely has a lot of similarities to the other bowlers in the attack.