the big bambino
International Captain
I think warner laid that accusation to rest with his recent efforts in BD. Classifying Smith as a home track bully is just an out and out misclassification.
His stats say differently.I think warner laid that accusation to rest with his recent efforts in BD. Classifying Smith as a home track bully is just an out and out misclassification.
The point was less that they're bad or anything of the sort when away from home, but that their batting is clearly much superior in home conditionsI think warner laid that accusation to rest with his recent efforts in BD. Classifying Smith as a home track bully is just an out and out misclassification.
You're a bit optimistic in calling Cook and Bairstow among the best Batsmen in the world right now.First post on here
Why are England fans so despondent? I think we outclass Oz in every dept. As a new pensioner (65 this year) and a profound pessimist as far as all England's national sports teams go, I see no reason why convict butt cannot be kicked. Root, Cook and Bairstow are 3 of the best batsmen in the world right now. Spinners? Lyon > Mo. Maybe but even the most devout Aussie fan would not argue that he was a better bat. On keeping ability alone Bairstow and Wade are about equal, Australia have pace in their seam attack but not the guile of England. o why are we so half-hearted in our support?
Australia have three flat/home track bullies, Warner, Khawaja and Smith, which will go massive on specially prepared wickets. That is my main fear for England. And before anyone starts complaining, all three have massive differential home/away averages - even Smith improves 14.71 on an Aussie road.
Who's - Warners? Away he's patchy but that's mainly due to his ineffectiveness in the subcon. A circumstance which he has recently countered. He's far better in Oz but his record OS isn't so bad as to call him a home track bully. Usman I'd be inclined to say yes. Smith is good just about everywhere.His stats say differently.
He's more of a partisan hack fanboy for the players, and if you tell him as much the words speak for themselves.I honestly think George Dobell is paid by the ECB. Embedded journalism at its worst.
It's really hard to pick a favourite. I think England's bar is higher for batting but will they be able to play to it in Aus and without Stokes. A tough one. I'd go England 2-1.
Warner's average is still 41.38 away (an increase of 3.13) when we remove the Asian countries compared to 59.22 at home. There is no getting away from the fact that the gulf between his home and away average is massive.Who's - Warners? Away he's patchy but that's mainly due to his ineffectiveness in the subcon. A circumstance which he has recently countered. He's far better in Oz but his record OS isn't so bad as to call him a home track bully. Usman I'd be inclined to say yes. Smith is good just about everywhere.
Warner's average is still 41.38 away (an increase of 3.13) when we remove the Asian countries compared to 59.22 at home. There is no getting away from the fact that the gulf between his home and away average is massive.
I may be missing something, but why do we care??Home and away differential of top Ashes bats,
Khawaja: 36.53!!
Warner: 20.97
Smith: 14.67
Root: 9.47
Bairstow: 8.96
M. Ali: 8.66
Cook: -2.01
Stokes: -3.47 (for sake of argument)
The top three spots are all Australian - by some margin.
Smith averages 54 away?Australia have three flat/home track bullies, Warner, Khawaja and Smith, which will go massive on specially prepared wickets. That is my main fear for England. And before anyone starts complaining, all three have massive differential home/away averages - even Smith improves 14.71 on an Aussie road.
Them playing good cricket at home is a bigger win tbh.Also, performances in Bangladesh being used as an example of being good overseas is a huge win for their non-minnow status.
Steve Waugh averaged 94?Smith isn't a home track bully, he's a first innings bully. Averages 94 in the first innings, 50 in the second innings, 47 in the third and 33 in the fourth.
Win the toss and send him in to bat and he's merely as good as Steve Waugh.
Warner's os problems are mostly (not completely) down to bad stats in India and Sri Lanka. He's done well in BD and UAE. That series in BD was tight, the home team really good, and I'd hate to think what would have happened without Warner, particularly as Smith failed. All I'm saying is that it shows Warner can prove he can succeed on subcon wickets which basically gives him the reputation as being poor overseas which I think is a distorted reputation.Also, performances in Bangladesh being used as an example of being good overseas is a huge win for their non-minnow status.