• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ricky Ponting vs. Kumar Sangakkara (ODIs)

Who was better in ODIs?


  • Total voters
    33
  • Poll closed .

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Might help if you didn't selectively feign deafness yet again and read the very next sentence after the one you quoted.
Tendulkar had the better peak IMO (depending on how you define 'peak'). Plus there is no clear definition of peak. So, that's not a statistical argument.

Is peak a one-test phenomenon? Or 10 tests? 10 years? 57 tests? 7.54425435 years? 24 years? 18 years?
 
Last edited:

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Huh, you'll say out of the blue that Ponting and Tendulkar are 'dead even' statistically - and nobody else has any right to point out the incorrectness in that statement.

They are not dead even statistically in any sense of the term. Period.
 

Johnners

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
When comparing Ponting & Sangakarra, I find it entirely offensive that no-one has mentioned Mitchell Johnson.
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
When comparing Ponting & Sangakarra, I find it entirely offensive that no-one has mentioned Mitchell Johnson.
Mitchell Johnson is dead even statistically with Sreesanth. If you have to compare them don't use statistics. People who prefer unnecessary aggression and drama are justified in liking Sreesanth slightly more.

I did it for you.
 
Last edited:

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
'Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.'
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Also, if you think Johnson and Sreesanth aren't statistically even then you are just a Mitchell Johnson-fanboy, and all things said about Johnson-fanboys are proven correct. You are just an imbecile fanboy, and I am the true objective cricket observer. I am better, you are worse. I am the king, you are the queen's servant.
 
Last edited:

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
I thought it was the same World Cup awarded 3 times?

It weights 11 kg though, so I agree that's very heavy for Ponting - especially when he also had to concentrate on which way Harbhajan Singh's deliveries are spinning.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Can't play Harbhajan's bowling====> World Cup trophy heavier.

That's some scary good logic right there, weldone.
 

BigBrother

U19 12th Man
Yeah, no. neither Pollock nor Donald were playing. In fact Donald had been retired for like 5 years . . .
Lol, try Nicky Boje, Ntini and Andre Nel

I was talking about Ponting...

There has been a lot of misreading of posts, especially by me so I can't really blame you.


I know that the Ashes is prestigious, but as a challenge for Australian batsmen is it really up there? When Ponting faced England he never had to bat against any ATG bowlers (I know the 2005 'attack' was excellent), but who was England's last great bowler? Botham? Willis? Underwood? Snow? Trueman?????

Surely scoring runs against Pakistan or 287 against Steyn should rate higher than Ashes runs for Australia (obv Ashes runs would rate for Englishmen - Michael Vaughan in that series in Oz many moons ago was stunningly good?
He started talking about Sangakkara without mentioning him so that confused me. That's why I was going in my mind where the hell is he getiing 287 from, must have been a typo..

Yeah so my bad. But here's your clue saying I was definitely talking about Ponting :p


Except when he wasn't facing Steyn he would have been facing Pollock and Donald, two other ATG bowlers...

Steyn has been a gun bowler ever since 2007 btw, he never played Australia before 2008.
 
Last edited:

BigBrother

U19 12th Man
I thought it was the same World Cup awarded 3 times?

It weights 11 kg though, so I agree that's very heavy for Ponting - especially when he also had to concentrate on which way Harbhajan Singh's deliveries are spinning.
World Cup = ODI cricket, where I'm pretty sure he has hammered that little **** quite a bit.

Put some effort into your trolling.
 

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
World Cup = ODI cricket, where I'm pretty sure he has hammered that little **** quite a bit.

Put some effort into your trolling.
The original supposed-to-be-funny comment about the weight of the World Cup by the poster was made in response to the comparison between Tendulkar and the cheat **** as test batsmen.

Put some effort into your reading.
 

BigBrother

U19 12th Man
The original supposed-to-be-funny comment about the weight of the World Cup by the poster was made in response to the comparison between Tendulkar and the cheat **** as test batsmen.

Put some effort into your reading.
If being butthurt about a Tendulkar joke (or Tendulkar not being seen as God of cricket the way you post) is a good enough reason to post senseless drivel, you should go back to the cricinfo comments section. I'm pretty sure they miss your analogies about weight and it's effect on playing the turning ball.
 

Top