silentstriker
The Wheel is Forever
I'm going to go Barnes.
The lack of quality bowlers does not refer to guys who are on their way out (Murali, McGrath, Warne, Kumble, Pollock). As far as the top 3, I think it's spot on. Marshall and Murali have no comparison. McGrath has done what Hadlee did on flatter pitches. I'm slightly doubtful about Ambrose being that high, but by no means is it an outrageous pick.silentstriker said:Odd that the top six bowlers of all time have played in the last 25 years (I'm guilty of voting recent too).
The batting list has a couple players like Hobbs, Bradman and Sobers, and Hammond might come in soon. Its doubly weird that three bowlers out of six (Murali, warne, Mcgrath) are still playing cricket - in an era where we (including me) bemoan the lack of quality bowlers.
I think that's because the current player's exploits are still fresh in everyone's minds. Also, in today's age where bowling standards are generally considered to be in decline, we get doubly impressed by the few bowlers who are actually capable of greatness.silentstriker said:Odd that the top six bowlers of all time have played in the last 25 years (I'm guilty of voting recent too).
The batting list has a couple players like Hobbs, Bradman and Sobers, and Hammond might come in soon. Its doubly weird that three bowlers out of six (Murali, warne, Mcgrath) are still playing cricket - in an era where we (including me) bemoan the lack of quality bowlers.
I agree that its spot on. But I still think its odd that we have three of the top six bowlers of all time playing right now, and yet batsman's averages are skyrocketing. It really highlights the fact that aside from those at the very top, everyone just kind of sucks.adharcric said:The lack of quality bowlers does not refer to guys who are on their way out (Murali, McGrath, Warne, Kumble, Pollock). As far as the top 3, I think it's spot on. Marshall and Murali have no comparison. McGrath has done what Hadlee did on flatter pitches. I'm slightly doubtful about Ambrose being that high, but by no means is it an outrageous pick.
Having seen a lot of cricket in the 90s, i am not surprised at all.I'm slightly doubtful about Ambrose being that high, but by no means is it an outrageous pick.
silentstriker said:I agree that its spot on. But I still think its odd that we have three of the top six bowlers of all time playing right now, and yet batsman's averages are skyrocketing. It really highlights the fact that aside from those at the very top, everyone just kind of sucks.