subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Actually because Flintoff batted higher in the order. But on reflection I switch my opinion, I go for Kapil then, you make good points.
Last edited:
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Rank batting and bowling ARs based on their secondary disciplines
- Thread starter subshakerz
- Start date
Pap Finn Keighl
International Debutant
No.
He was clearly a batting Allrounder.
Are you just making this stuff up or looking at the wrong stats?
Flintoff averaged more centuries per Test, but fewer per innings batted. There isn't a lot of difference in either though. However when it comes to scores of 50 plus per Test or innings batted, Flintoff is comfortably ahead by a lot.
Flintoff played 40% less games than Kapil which would mean less opportunities for those "iconic innings".
Also where are you finding Kapils Test batting SR as it's not listed anywhere I've looked?
subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
Thanks for pointing this. I will switch back to Flintoff now.
As for iconic innings, Flintoff has an Ashes winning ton that I think qualifies.
PlayerComparisons
International Vice-Captain
Kapils strike rate was around 80 in tests I think?
