Nah. That, the 4/0 one, and the O'Reilly one's I got incorrect.Fair enough. Well done then.
Did you get the Cheema one correct? If anyone did, well done!
Indeed. I was about to argue that there was no way 60,000+ wickets could have been taken, then remembered that 40, not 20 wickets can fall each Test.
That's pretty special.
Damnit - remembered it was a current player who is a **** pace bowler, but picked the wrong one.No-one got the Cheema one correct, which I thought was weird because people kept talking about his record during the Pakistan-England series in January. It's his record by a sizeable margin too, six matches with the next best only two or three.
Morgie's surprised me on occasion with his knowledge of Indian domestic cricket, so I believe he really does have an impressive knowledge of cricket trivia.You're not the only one that thought that. I'm smarter at cricket trivia than people think. I do read a **** load about cricket.
Nope.Damnit - remembered it was a current player who is a **** pace bowler, but picked the wrong one.
Out of interest were there any questions that only one person got right?
Sever bull**** on the Dev questionNah. That, the 4/0 one, and the O'Reilly one's I got incorrect.
Checking current scorecards =! knowing about the history of the game.Morgie's surprised me on occasion with his knowledge of Indian domestic cricket, so I believe he really does have an impressive knowledge of cricket trivia.
Nah, it was during a discussion on Indian domestic cricket a while back.Checking current scorecards =! knowing about the history of the game.