Does it matter whether we are big names of not?marc71178 said:Some people who aren't really big names will try to defend him, then the majority of the players will prosecute.
so, you won't accept the boards decision unless it is in your favour? This stinks of hypocrisy.or b) be acquitted and there'll be strike action.
Some people who aren't really big names
yeah, but we don't really have big names...steds-5 letters, NikhilN-7 letters, DJellett-8 lettersNikhilN said:I really can't believe you are saying that
Loony BoB said:How does a trial work in the CW XI, out of curiosity?
I agree that Nikhil should be banned for life.marc71178 said:I assume you've looked at the evidence (which tends to be a major part of any court case)
The reason people don't want a trial is because the board is only 2 people and they won't be taking everyone elses word, rather making their own decision between themselves. That's not really a fair way for things to be done, but that is the fear that I dare say most are holding. It was unanimous that people didn't want Nikhil to play and I for one can't believe it is even being considered again for this reason.Mr Mxyzptlk said:The only reason I can see for people being opposed to the trial is that they're afraid that Nikhil will win and thus at some point return to Dev League cricket. I would have thought the people to be so confident of victory that they'd consider this but a formality.
don't take things out've context nikhil. no one's quite ready to jump on ur bandwagon yet. If you read the whole post I'm sure Marc didn't mean it in a condoscending way.NikhilN said:I really can't believe you are saying that
Oh mate the board isint the only one on the jury panel...The reason people don't want a trial is because the board is only 2 people and they won't be taking everyone elses word
I Dont quite get that mate.. so once the trial is done , what more is there to vote on?I'll stand by whatever decision the board makes and won't strike. as long as we are given an oppurtunity to voice our opinions and they are actually taken into consideration.... i.e a vote.
Will be released soon my friend..Yeah, that's what I was wondering about with regards to how a trial is run - ie, will there be a jury, etc.
Basically what I'm saying is I'll agree with the board as long as the process is conducted in a way that takes everyone's views into considerationlord_of_darkness said:I Dont quite get that mate.. so once the trial is done , what more is there to vote on?