• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Playing Selector: Top five test all rounders ever

Choose the top five test allrounders of all time


  • Total voters
    49

bagapath

International Captain
The idea is to see who the younger CW members consider as the top five test allrounders of all time.
Want to choose five names because it is boring to boil the whole argument down to Sobers and one more person all the time.
Here are my top canditates.

Batting allrounders

Sobers
Grieg
Kallis
Stokes

Batsmen who can bowl

Armstrong
Woolley
Hammond
Mushtaq
McMillan
Jayasuriya

Bowling allrounders

Rhodes
Noble
Faulkner
Gregory
Miller
Mankad
Imran
Botham
Kapil
Cairns
Flintoff
Shakib
Jadeja

Bowlers who can bat

Tate
Lindwall
Bailey
Benaud
Hadlee
Akram
Streak
S Pollock
Ashwin
Woakes
 
Last edited:

bagapath

International Captain
The cutoff makes this easy.



Both clearly batting all-rounders, for the record.
Agree with Woolley and moved him.
Faulkner averaged 3+ wickets per test and was a main strike bowler. Leaving him in the company of Miller / Imran and co
 

Qlder

International Debutant
You missed the category "Pure Allrounder" with equal batting and bowling skill

Keith Miller
Ian Botham
Andrew Flintoff

These three were not bowing allrounders when they batted in top 6 their whole careers
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
A few pretty decent options missing who are better than some on the list (apologies if they are there and I missed their names):

McCartney, Foster, McCabe, Worrell, Reid, Davidson, Dexter, Walters, Barlow, Goddard, Procter, Mudassar Nazar, Shastri, Wasim, Oram, Vettori, Watson, Philander, De Grandhomme, Holder, Axar
 
Last edited:

Coronis

International Coach
Sobers
Miller
Imran
Kallis
Botham


You missed the category "Pure Allrounder" with equal batting and bowling skill

Keith Miller
Ian Botham
Andrew Flintoff

These three were not bowing allrounders when they batted in top 6 their whole careers
lol. Miller and Botham’s bowling was clearly superior to their batting. Flintoff might be closer.
 

Coronis

International Coach
Ok. Guess that's why Keith Miller batted 4 with Don Bradman and Neil Harvey in the same side
If you think averaging 37 with the bat is equal in skill to averaging 23 with the ball then hey, I’m not gonna argue with you. Wish Sobers was more balanced with a Barnesesque bowling average.
 

Qlder

International Debutant
If you think averaging 37 with the bat is equal in skill to averaging 23 with the ball then hey, I’m not gonna argue with you. Wish Sobers was more balanced with a Barnesesque bowling average.
Yes I do because despite opening the bowling he only took 3.1 wkts per Test (and his FC batting average was 48.90 with 41 hundreds so Test average of 37 misses a lot)
 

kyear2

International Coach
Ok. Guess that's why Keith Miller batted 4 with Don Bradman and Neil Harvey in the same side
He had 7 centuries, 3 of which were in one series in the west indies where he averaged 73, and where the 3Ws are marked down for being flat track bullies. Not saying he wasn't a decent batsman, but he averaged basically what Hooper did.
 

Qlder

International Debutant
He had 7 centuries, 3 of which were in one series in the west indies where he averaged 73, and where the 3Ws are marked down for being flat track bullies. Not saying he wasn't a decent batsman, but he averaged basically what Hooper did.
That's like saying Kim Hughes was a crap batsman because he averaged only 37. Guarantee no-one who actually watched Kim Hughes bat thinks that.

Same as Bradman wouldn't bat Miller before Harvey unless he considered him a better bat.
 
Last edited:

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
That's like saying Kim Hughes was a crap batsman because he averaged only 37. Guarantee no-one who actually watched Kim Hughes bat thinks that.

Same as Bradman wouldn't bat Miller before Harvey unless he considered him a better bat.
We are talking about teenage Harvey here though
 

Qlder

International Debutant
We are talking about teenage Harvey here though
Keith Miller batted 3 after Bradman retired with Harvey at 4 until he was 22. At that point Harvey was averging 106 so was understandably moved up to 3 with Miller at 4
 

Coronis

International Coach
That's like saying Kim Hughes was a crap batsman because he averaged only 37. Guarantee no-one who actually watched Kim Hughes bat thinks that.
Who said he was a crap batsman? I’m just saying he’s not a borderline ATG batsman whereas he was a borderline ATG bowler. Hot take I know but I’ll stick to it.

Same as Bradman wouldn't bat Miller before Harvey unless he considered him a better bat.
Congratulations on finding such a strong argument. I suppose you think all 3’s are better than 4’s and all 4’s better than 5’s?
 

Qlder

International Debutant
Congratulations on finding such a strong argument. I suppose you think all 3’s are better than 4’s and all 4’s better than 5’s?
Up until Greg Chappell batted 4, Australia always had their best batsman at 3, even then you could argue that was Ian Chappell who averaged 50.94 at 3 (and Ricky Ponting followed at 3)
 
Last edited:

Coronis

International Coach
Up until Greg Chappell batted 4, Australia always had their best batsman at 3, even then you could argue that was Ian Chappell who averaged 50.94 at 3 (and Ricky Ponting followed at 3)
Mate you’re wrong, Miller was not a near ATG batsman, no matter what position he batted, get over it.
 

Top