Possible explanation for Lillee's low rating
Like others I think there is a problem with the
Lillee and other Australian bowlers of that era.
I do have a possible explanation -
In the period 1969 --> 1985
* Australian (top 6) Batting averages where
25% higher when Lillee plays compared to when he did not. Its 20% if you exclude WSC. That's like replacing Steve Waugh with Don Bradman.
* Bowling averages of many of the Australian Fast bowlers (Thomson, Walker, Lawson, Hogg) are 15% higher when Lillee plays.
I do not know if the boost to the batting average was caused by
flatter wickets or something else. This would mean the
Country pitch analysis used in the calculation is wrong (to bowler friendly) for Lillee (and other Australian bowlers of the era).
A second factor is during
World Series cricket, batting averages in Australia where lower than normal. That will make Australia seem more bowler friendly than it really was.
References:
Batting average when Lillee plays
Batting Average with Lillee is not playing