Shoaib Malik is as a good a fielder as Collingwood is,Collingwood is a better bowler though.Collingwood by a fair way, equal batsmen, Collingwood a much better bowler and fielder.
Not by any stretch of the imagination, no way.Shoaib Malik is as a good a fielder as Collingwood is,Collingwood is a better bowler though.
Nah, Collingwood > Malik as a fielder. Malik > Collingwood as a ODI batsman, but they're both equally crap in the longer form.Shoaib Malik is as a good a fielder as Collingwood is,Collingwood is a better bowler though.
Collingwood's scorebook-average flatters him, grossly so in recent times, and he's mostly only scored proper runs when the going's been easy.
Malik has hardly played any Tests and how on Earth he averages so well is beyond me. Fully expect it to come down very soon.
Well nobody is denying it was a gun innings and maybe one of the best I've seen, but it really was a one off when comparing it to scores against other quality attacks.yeah scoring that double ton against australia in australia was a piece of piss for him wasnt it? or do they not count as proper runs. he gets ripped for scoring runs against crap attacks but when he gets runs against the best international attack it gets ignored.
It doesn't get ignored at all, but that Adelaide match was an oasis in the desert, and he did nothing else of note all series bar the previous innings.yeah scoring that double ton against australia in australia was a piece of piss for him wasnt it? or do they not count as proper runs. he gets ripped for scoring runs against crap attacks but when he gets runs against the best international attack it gets ignored.
( Still made me laugh though )Would take Malik because he has the distinct advantage of not being English.
I dont think so!!! Collingwood is the best in my opinion.....Highly rate Malik, his leadership and batting in the 20/20 World Cup was inspirational.