• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Paul Collingwood and Shoaib Malik?

deira

Banned
Dont you guys thinks that these two have the exact same batting style? also both of them have been pretty consistent in their runs for the last few years.
 

deira

Banned
Collingwood has been better in tests thier oneday averages are almost identical at just above 34. Also the style of batting is very similar both love to sweep and are very good spin players
 

deira

Banned
Collingwood has a average of 43^ how is that crap. Malik is around 38 and rising every year in tests
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Collingwood's scorebook-average flatters him, grossly so in recent times, and he's mostly only scored proper runs when the going's been easy.

Malik has hardly played any Tests and how on Earth he averages so well is beyond me. Fully expect it to come down very soon.
 

jammay123

State 12th Man
Collingwood's scorebook-average flatters him, grossly so in recent times, and he's mostly only scored proper runs when the going's been easy.

Malik has hardly played any Tests and how on Earth he averages so well is beyond me. Fully expect it to come down very soon.

yeah scoring that double ton against australia in australia was a piece of piss for him wasnt it? or do they not count as proper runs. he gets ripped for scoring runs against crap attacks but when he gets runs against the best international attack it gets ignored.
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
yeah scoring that double ton against australia in australia was a piece of piss for him wasnt it? or do they not count as proper runs. he gets ripped for scoring runs against crap attacks but when he gets runs against the best international attack it gets ignored.
Well nobody is denying it was a gun innings and maybe one of the best I've seen, but it really was a one off when comparing it to scores against other quality attacks.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
yeah scoring that double ton against australia in australia was a piece of piss for him wasnt it? or do they not count as proper runs. he gets ripped for scoring runs against crap attacks but when he gets runs against the best international attack it gets ignored.
It doesn't get ignored at all, but that Adelaide match was an oasis in the desert, and he did nothing else of note all series bar the previous innings.
 

Glacier

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Well Shoaib Malik has scored a 148* against Murali on day 5 and only recently has been given a real run in the test side at a settled position. Lets judge him based on what he does this year.
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
Highly rate Malik, his leadership and batting in the 20/20 World Cup was inspirational.
 

shortpitched713

International Captain
I don't find them to have particularly similar batting styles. Malik is the more capable big hitter of the two. Bot good batsmen, with Collingwood being a better one in Tests and Malik just being better in ODIs, imo.
 

deira

Banned
^ actually did you see collingwood innings of 91 against india, he is definatly capable of hitting big shots.
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Big fan of Shoaib Malik, one of my favourite players. Hard to say at this time, but I think he's a bit better as an ODI player. Hasn't played enough Tests to compare to Collingwood, IMO.
 

Top