I blame you.What a great 100 run partnership... would love them both to downhill ski to their tons.
I will take part blame!!I blame myself. ****.
It has been ages. Two years for De Kock, and about 15 months for Amla, although that was two centuries against Bangladesh, so it becomes two years for him as well if you don't count those.Don't want to be greedy but these two need to get 100s
It feels like ages since they have done so in tests. So many 50s.
Yeah. But there needs to be a caveat batting on pitches like this in SA. Markram looked set for 2 tons and got great balls. Amla looked set for a ton here. 1 ton in this series. India and Aus series where not a great deal better.It has been ages. Two years for De Kock, and about 15 months for Amla, although that was two centuries against Bangladesh, so it becomes two years for him as well if you don't count those.
The pitch isn't all that bad. South Africa scored at 3.37 in their first innings (and were even quicker than that when Markram was at crease), Pakistan scored at 3.72, and South Africa are currently going at 3.83. So runs havn't been hard to come by - it's just keeping wickets intact that both teams have found a problem.Pitch curator might be in trouble for this after last year’s farce...
Need five bowlers? Perhaps not. Very useful to have five bowlers? Yes, provided the batting isn't compromised.Do we need five bowlers in India? I don't think so if the pitches are anything like the ones we got last time around. I don't think they will be that bad though, Maharaj is the best spinner we have had since 1992. I'd like Hamza and Bavuma in there. The issue is the bowling attack other than Maharaj. Is Dale a certain starter now in a two man pace attack?
Balls shouldn’t be spitting off a length on day 3 like that one Amla just got,also Hamza got a bit of a shooter yesterdayThe pitch isn't all that bad. South Africa scored at 3.37 in their first innings (and were even quicker than that when Markram was at crease), Pakistan scored at 3.72, and South Africa are currently going at 3.83. So runs havn't been hard to come by - it's just keeping wickets intact that both teams have found a problem.
I think Mulder can be in our best 6 batsman. Being a 3rd seamer for us would be the bonus.Need five bowlers? Perhaps not. Very useful to have five bowlers? Yes, provided the batting isn't compromised.
Yes. Dale has looked really good. Been a bit unlucky in the wicket department. Still one of our best 3 bowlers with Rabada and Philander. And you will play him over Philander in SC. If we play 3 seamers you may want a a more stock bowler like Olivier over Philander. But think 2 spinners with 2 pace men should be fine in India. Expect the spinners to bowl the bulk of the overs anyway.Do we need five bowlers in India? I don't think so if the pitches are anything like the ones we got last time around. I don't think they will be that bad though, Maharaj is the best spinner we have had since 1992. I'd like Hamza and Bavuma in there. The issue is the bowling attack other than Maharaj. Is Dale a certain starter now in a two man pace attack?
Is Mulder experienced and good enough in SC against spin?I think Mulder can be in our best 6 batsman. Being a 3rd seamer for us would be the bonus.
Whilst fast bowling won games for us in India (bar Boje game) is it still possible to go in with 3 front line quicks and win there ? This is what goes through my mind because if we go with 2 front line spinners Mulder is ideal.
Is Hamza ? Is Markram ?Is Mulder experienced and good enough in SC against spin?
Is there anyone who you can say without a doubt would be more experienced and better than him?Is Mulder experienced and good enough in SC against spin?