sledger
Spanish_Vicente
Haha it must have been ten years ago or so by nowAh what an amazing moment that was
I think I still have the screenshot somewhere
Haha it must have been ten years ago or so by nowAh what an amazing moment that was
man this would have been good advice to take at the timeShady go to bed
Yeah it's usually less warmongering and more of dumb **** like this:like I'm happy to hear concrete criticism of American/Five Eyes foreign policy and their approach to the Asia-Pacific, and Australian diplomacy (especially Dutton) has been daft of late. But those criticising have to actually engage at a concrete level with the actual events that are going on; vagueness is the enemy of honesty in these discussions.
oh yeah the china initiative is ****ing horrible, modern mccarthyism at it's highestYeah it's usually less warmongering and more of dumb **** like this:
if you take it in isolation sure, it's anodyne, but it's not in isolation is it man, you're missing the bigger picture - it's but a two of clubs in a much greater game of poker see, that being the entire australian foreign policy attitude towards countries such as china including things like the commentaries coming from peter dutton, which as you (correctly!) say are very daft (and that's a mad understatement but i know we're just talking shop so i'm not going to try to suggest you meant it was merely "daft" lol)we're talking about a few governments not sending diplomats to the Olympic Games. it's literally about as anodyne, as insubstantial and frankly as vapid a statement of protest as you can get at a official level. if that is beyond the pale with regards to"encouraging racism" then literally everything is beyond the pale and no official criticism of Chinese human rights is at all possible.
meanwhile we have vague references to "evil atrocities" whilst an ethnic minority, literally millions of people, are being held in concentration camps (by the Chinese government's own admission!) and forcibly sterilised and/or being forced into ***ual slavery. this is rank false equivalence, to put it very mildly. what does "fair and reasonable" criticism of this obviously genocidal policy look like if all we're going to hear is "but America" every single time?
That is literally the opposite of what you’ve been suggesting throughout these discussions though. You haven’t said “criticism of China is fine, but they should apply that to Saudi Arabia or the UAE or Egypt” etc etc, you’ve just said they should basically stop criticising China because it axiomatically leads to racism.one of the terrible parts of the boycott naturally is that sport is a great arena to foster diplomacy, and doing the boycott ensures things stay frosty, but that's a personal gripe with the method and not relevant to our current discussion here and now - pretty obvious what has to be done for the criticism levelled by a country like australia to be credible, and that's to simply stop backing apartheid states and states who do ethnic cleansing! you'd think this is an incredibly low bar to clear lmao
i feel you've misunderstood what i'm trying to say then, but i'll take the blame for that because i generally play my words pretty fast and loose when posting so there's always room for misinterpretation lolThat is literally the opposite of what you’ve been suggesting throughout these discussions though. You haven’t said “criticism of China is fine, but they should apply that to Saudi Arabia or the UAE or Egypt” etc etc, you’ve just said they should basically stop criticising China because it axiomatically leads to racism.
The point about credibility goes right back to my earlier point about hypocrisy. If “credibility” is being cited as a reason to hold back on lodging tame official protests at genocide then credibility is more trouble than it’s actually worth.
Like, they aren’t going to be more likely to criticise and pressure nominally pro-Western Middle Eastern autocratic regimes (most of which have, side notes, been moving towards Russia and China because they feel that the US in particular is starting to get pushy about their human rights records) because they’ve held off on criticising China. That’s just totally backwards; they should hold the line on China and then carry over the same attitude to everyone else.
i reiterate and repeat this, which sums my position nicely and directly goes against what you've accused my point of being lolgreat thing about truth though is that more than one thing can be true at the same time so long as they aren't mutually exclusive, and while the above statement is definitely true, it is also true that you can criticise regimes that do things you don't like, but do so in a way that is fair and reasonable, that is not just race bait for the worst people in the country, that is not flagrantly hypocritical and that doesn't encourage domestic racism against the diasporate populations, and that's what the australian government simply has not done.
yes which is why i asked what this “fair and reasonable” standard is practice when it comes to acceptable ways to protest genocide. we’re not talking about a messy trade dispute or broken procurement contract or what have you.i reiterate and repeat this, which sums my position nicely and directly goes against what you've accused my point of being lol
i feel i've already said what i think ought to be done but we're sort of talking in circles now if that's where we're atyes which is why i asked what this “fair and reasonable” standard is practice when it comes to acceptable ways to protest genocide. we’re not talking about a messy trade dispute or broken procurement contract or what have you.
like as far as i’m concerned, a fair and reasonable standard to take to genocidaires is a cruise missile to the face. quite fortunately, this is not actually what is done or should be done. but it does mean that complaints about proportionality ring quite hollow.