• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* World Test Championship Final at The Oval – June 7–11, 2023

Adders

Cricketer Of The Year
Could potentially be just as many logistical problems trying to fit in a 3 test series than a timeless test, possibly even more, I would have thought

Really just need to make sure we have a result pitch, and avoid playing in an excessively wet, dank and depressing country
How are there logistical issues scheduling a 3 test series? We do them all the time.

There just needs a willingness from the boards to do it and to give some priority to this WTC.......hard to expect the punters to care if the boards don't think this is important enough to warrant 3/4 weeks in their calendar.

Edit: and just having a results pitch won't make me think the best team is necessarily the champ.......anyone can win a one off test.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I think the decks are pretty flat. England also played on a similar flat deck vs Ireland. This is consistent with Stokes ordering fast and flat pitches for the ashes.

If this is the case expect some draws in the ashes, and bowlers to be rotated due to the heavy workloads on flat decks.
That was a good bowling pitch but India simply didn’t make the most of it
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
How are there logistical issues scheduling a 3 test series? We do them all the time.
Because the finalists aren't decided until a few months prior, and the schedule is packed as it is.

It's a pretty big ask for every country to be available for a 3 test series, which would be a solid month at least, just in case they make the final.
 

sphynx

U19 Debutant
I think the decks are pretty flat. England also played on a similar flat deck vs Ireland. This is consistent with Stokes ordering fast and flat pitches for the ashes.

If this is the case expect some draws in the ashes, and bowlers to be rotated due to the heavy workloads on flat decks.
Unsure if there will be too many draws with England attempting at scoring 6 RPO against a world class attack.

They are either setting massive totals in just over a day or will crash and burn attemping to slog.

Either way, I can't see their innings' chewing up too much time on average.

Draws are probably more of a possibility if England bat Australia out of a result in the first innings and Australia can keep England in the field for 150+ overs in response.
 

ashley bach

Cricketer Of The Year
Because the finalists aren't decided until a few months prior, and the schedule is packed as it is.

It's a pretty big ask for every country to be available for a 3 test series, which would be a solid month at least, just in case they make the final.
Make way for importance, like the scheduling of a world cup.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Edit: and just having a results pitch won't make me think the best team is necessarily the champ.......anyone can win a one off test.
No, well that's a completely different issue

If we're talking issues in general the biggest fix for me would be making the team that finishes on top the host. I think it's fair enough to say that an English pitch suits Australia more than India, and any game between a SENA team and Asian team is going to be heavily reliant on where the game is being played.

If you finish on top you deserve the home ground advantage
 

Spark

Global Moderator
How are there logistical issues scheduling a 3 test series? We do them all the time.

There just needs a willingness from the boards to do it and to give some priority to this WTC.......hard to expect the punters to care if the boards don't think this is important enough to warrant 3/4 weeks in their calendar.

Edit: and just having a results pitch won't make me think the best team is necessarily the champ.......anyone can win a one off test.
Fair bit different planning for a tour with three years' lead in time compared with three months.
 

ashley bach

Cricketer Of The Year
Sure but almost every "major" team is playing in the World Cup. Completely different thing to make every team free for a series that only 2 teams will be a part of
Realistically it's only about 4-5 teams but agree it isn't easy. Until they do something solid though it will always remain Micky Mouse.
 

Adders

Cricketer Of The Year
Because the finalists aren't decided until a few months prior, and the schedule is packed as it is.

It's a pretty big ask for every country to be available for a 3 test series, which would be a solid month at least, just in case they make the final.
To me that's a mindset of looking for problems instead of solutions.......which tbf is probably exactly the case with those making these decisions.

It's all doable if the desire is there to do it. They've introduced a WTC to give relevance to the format......and the final is a totally unsatisfactory way to finish it up imo.

Which is why you yourself have said this is just a warm up game for the Ashes and I'd feel exactly the same should Eng have been playing here.......its not important enough because we all know it's a crap conclusion to round out the 4 year cycle.
 

Adders

Cricketer Of The Year
No, well that's a completely different issue

If we're talking issues in general the biggest fix for me would be making the team that finishes on top the host. I think it's fair enough to say that an English pitch suits Australia more than India, and any game between a SENA team and Asian team is going to be heavily reliant on where the game is being played.

If you finish on top you deserve the home ground advantage
Agree with this mostly.......but I do think a neutral venue for the final has value as it takes the home advantage out of the equation. I don't think that it should be always in Eng though.
 

Adders

Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah no arguments here it's a pointless game
But if this was run and scheduled differently I don't believe we'd be thinking like that.

This should be a big deal and we should be thinking of it in terms of importance like the ODI WC......but I won't ever, such as it is now.
 

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
Only one of Shami and Umesh should play in England.

Ashwin should never be dropped except on the most pace friendly of SA pitches where one of the ok backup pacers legitimately becomes more threatening.

Ishant Sharma was underrated. Bring him back if he's still up for it in Ranji.

Thakur has exceeded his ceiling with both bat and ball far too many times already. He's just going to get #punished. Bin him and let him join Paynter and Voges as one for the future generations to scratch their heads over.
Shardul already won India a test in ENG and AUS that lead to series draws/Wins and took 12 wickets @19 and made some handy runs in that SA series India lost 1-2. Drop him and let some random guy on here in 10 years argue he'd have outperformed kapil if he got more chances.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Agree with this mostly.......but I do think a neutral venue for the final has value as it takes the home advantage out of the equation. I don't think that it should be always in Eng though.
In theory but it doesn't always work out like that

If it's Aus v India then most "neutral" venues in Asia will give India a huge advantage. Likewise any "neutral" venue in SENA should give Aus an advantage
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I still think having the away team choose to bat or bowl instead of a coin toss is such an easy improvement for test cricket.
 

Top