My idea was basically the same 4 teams they played last year in the domestic comp.Where is it?
noneIm not criticising, just asking. How many of the Canadians learned their cricket in Canada?
Scotland
Ireland
Netherlands
Kenya
Ireland are playing Netherlands....
True but they have to find a way to fit it around the already existing NPCA and CPCA and RVCA club schedules. Being as the season generally follows the Old British cricket season of March to September, they could cajole the provincial leagues to wrap up their leagues by end of May, so that July-September can be used exculsively for the elite leaguesMy idea was basically the same 4 teams they played last year in the domestic comp.
Play a t20 comp over the first two weekends with each team playing each other once, then on the Sunday in the 2nd weekend have a 3rd v 4th playoff and a final.
Then the 50 over comp one match each Saturday with each team playing each other once, then a final weekend with 3rd v 4th on the Saturday and the Final on the Sunday.
Then with a 2 day comp similar to how club cricket is run here in Australia. Play the match over two weekends. Once again each team playing each other once then a finals series on the final weekend with the finals played over 2 consecutive days rather then 2 weekends.
Have a one week break between the t20 and 50 over comp, and 2 weeks between the 50 over and 2 day comp.
So there's a good 4 consecutive months of competitive cricket for the players.
Out of these games a national side would be picked for ODI's (assuming Kenya retain their status) and an 'A' side should be picked also and try to organise matches with Namibia, Uganda and maybe a development South African team.
Anyway, the big issue here is funding, and I have no idea why I just typed that all out.
Early morning dew is really hurting the teams that lose the toss. So they decided to sacrifice a bowler (who can bat a little bit) and hold reekers back. If he fails to fire later on, the gamble didn't work out.That was an odd move from the Dutch. Weird choice of opener. I thought De Grooth was an opener?
I guess they have to have these early starts though, because it's getting dark so early now? At least they can play early autumn cricket in the Cape - imagine trying to stage a similar tournament in England in October.Early morning dew is really hurting the teams that lose the toss. So they decided to sacrifice a bowler (who can bat a little bit) and hold reekers back. If he fails to fire later on, the gamble didn't work out.
Solid start from them today. 63/1 ater 15 v Scotland.I really hope Afganistan make the top six.
Afghanistan's NRR isn't bad at all for a team with 2 points - each victory means an increase in NRR with each loss being a decrease. I'd assume if they win 2 more, and Kenya/Netherlands lose 2 more, their NRR would probably be higher (unless someone somewhere gets thrashed really badly)Any team that finished on 6 points would be in with a chance I suppose; Afghanistan would really have to improve their net run rate though as well as hope for other results to go in their favour.
Yeah, but their problem is that they now have to have three results - in addition to their own (both Dutch games + Scotland don't thump UAE too much) go the right way for them to qualify - I know each of them in isolation is somewhat realistic, but all of them probably won't happen. Also, you shouldn't finish fourth in an eight-team league by losing more games than you win.I don't get all this talk about Afghanistan's World Cup dream being over, hoping they make it into the top 6 etc. - from my understanding if the Dutch lose both their games (which is somewhat realistic considering it's against Ireland & Canada) and Afghanistan win both theirs (which is again not outside the realm of possibility considering it's Scotland and Namibia) - the Afghans could very well still qualify for the World Cup, correct?
Thanks!
EDIT: On the assumption that their NRR's are higher than Scotland & Netherlands