Honestly, given that smith is 34 and clearly in a decline, I don't mind Smith opening for now. It allows green to bat in his preferred position, smith to come in earlier, which is where he's historically been at his best from memory, and either gives renshaw/bancroft another 1-2 years to figure out there respective issues (batting in asia and the moving ball in england/NZ) before they fully commit to them, or another two years for a fringe/young opener (jewell/hunt/street, or constas/harry dixon from the recent u19 batch) to figure out their stuff at international level.Have posted this before and don’t think that I am wrong
Bancroft was basically written off after looking ordinary against Johnson in the Marsh Cup, the Shield Final and in NZ for the A team
Stuart Clark (I think) dissected his technique in the first 2 games and basically said “improved but still dodgy” & you’d be naive to think that the selectors weren’t thinking the same
Renshaw failed in India but, more importantly, was discarded mid Ashes after strange outings as a substitute in India & England
It was an odd look at the time but makes more sense now
Harris has never been test standard and the selectors aren’t stupid
Reckon he only got a CA contract because they were awarded after the Indian tour when they weren’t convinced about Renshaw and had to name someone
So here we are
Personally would have elevated Marnus but Green isn’t an opener in any event
Yeah this makes sense to me tbh. I've never gotten the sense that they really believed any of those guys are actually good enough and were just searching around constantly for alternatives. Part of why Warner got such a long leash.Have posted this before and don’t think that I am wrong
Bancroft was basically written off after looking ordinary against Johnson in the Marsh Cup, the Shield Final and in NZ for the A team
Stuart Clark (I think) dissected his technique in the first 2 games and basically said “improved but still dodgy” & you’d be naive to think that the selectors weren’t thinking the same
Renshaw failed in India but, more importantly, was discarded mid Ashes after strange outings as a substitute fielder in India & England
It was an odd look at the time but makes more sense now
Harris has never been test standard and the selectors aren’t stupid
Reckon he only got a CA contract because they were awarded after the Indian tour when they weren’t convinced about Renshaw and had to name someone
So here we are
Personally would have elevated Marnus but Green isn’t an opener in any event
Shield isn't the end of the world, is it? Bancroft has failed whenever he's rocked up for the pm's 11/Aus-A and was worse then his WA opening partner in county. He's also 31, which means he's at the fag end of age where most batsmen peak, while renshaw is 27 and just coming into his peak years (generally 28-32 I think).Renshaw has scored 348 runs @ 31 in the Shield this season while Harris has 282 @ 31
They only have themselves to blame
Bancroft will be the unlucky one if they go with Smith etc
Renshaw also has 318 runs @ 318.00 for PM XI in last 12 monthsRenshaw has scored 348 runs @ 31 in the Shield this season while Harris has 282 @ 31
They only have themselves to blame
Bancroft will be the unlucky one if they go with Smith etc
Sounds good to me tbhRenshaw, Bancroft and Harris may as well give up on Test cricket, so might as well retire from Shield cricket as well
This has always been apparent and surprised it onto brought up more often. Smith clearly hates waiting to bat and generally doesn't as well as expected when he comes in at 2/200. He does best coming in at 2 for **** all, see 2019 AshesHonestly, given that smith is 34 and clearly in a decline, I don't mind Smith opening for now. It allows green to bat in his preferred position, smith to come in earlier
Smith won't be coming in at 2/300 this time with pressure to move the game along against a NZ team that's alreaey given upSmith is obviously terrified that his nemesis old man Wagner will still be in the NZ team so figures it is better to open to score some runs against Southee-Henry-Jamieson before facing the 115 km/h bouncer barrage.
Smith is a cricket nufty so I doubt that he’s retiring anytime soonNot what I would have done... but then again I would have preferred SOK for most of his career over Lyon so what would I know.
Hopefully this isn't Smith getting ready for retirement.
That they picked Renshaw sounds like they're set on Green coming into the Top 6. Had it been Bancroft or Harris I think it was still up in the air who replaced Warner, but Renshaw makes the most sense as "back up in case someone treds on a cricket ball" kind of areas.Well apparently Renshaw is in the squad so who knows what's happening. Is he the backup batsman? Is he in the team?
But that was 5 years ago and he was in the form of his life. Now he seems to be in terminal decline and we all know he's susceptible early in his innings to any movement before his hand/eye coordination kicks in. It'll be interesting though, but if it fails in these 2 Tests then the search for an opener will probably start again for the next series (when is that?).This has always been apparent and surprised it onto brought up more often. Smith clearly hates waiting to bat and generally doesn't as well as expected when he comes in at 2/200. He does best coming in at 2 for **** all, see 2019 Ashes