sirjeremy11
State Vice-Captain
NZ 216/7 at lunch. They scored 146 runs in the 27 over session. For 3 wickets. The Pig is on 58. Good luck to him. His test average on Eden Park right now is 228. Shot.
Last edited:
James said:We're a very average test playing nation, while our media seem to think we're world beaters.
Blaze said:Just read through this thread, huge overreactions IMO.
If Lou Vincent had have opened he would have nicked out early IMO. Do none of you remember the last time he opened in New Zealand conditions? It was against Pakistan and he looked completly out of his depth.
We can't say that Bracewell and co have made mistakes until at least the end of the series. We have to give them time.
NZTailender said:I'll admit, Vincent has some problems against the new ball when opening (yet not in ODI's?)
if you look at his record, his average vs spin bowlers (who have gotten him out) is very high. Vs pace, it's not so good.
I think Vincent is a much improved player now, opening or otherwise. Plus Shoaib was making the whole team look like fools, especially that Wellington test. His test bowling average against us is around 5 or something ridiculous.Blaze said:If Lou Vincent had have opened he would have nicked out early IMO. Do none of you remember the last time he opened in New Zealand conditions? It was against Pakistan and he looked completly out of his depth.
His defensive technique isn't any different. It is his approach that has changed.sirjeremy11 said:I think Vincent is a much improved player now, opening or otherwise. Plus Shoaib was making the whole team look like fools, especially that Wellington test. His test bowling average against us is around 5 or something ridiculous.
Yeah...Sportsgirl said:If Martin gets out he'll be wearing Scotty's bat I reckon
zinzan12 said:Blaze....your reading too much into Martins domestic season. Have a look at our recent test wins in New Zealand in the last couple of years, and you will see Martin has been a big factor. Don't get me wrong, he's certainly not a great bowler, but surely you can't be suggesting that Mills (2 test wks @ 90) is a better test candidate??
If you want to see the back of Martin, thats fine. But c'mon man, surely you can suggest a better test replacement that Mills??