yes , you're right- but holding the board and the fans to ransom isnt the way to go about dealing with it,they should have fulfilled their commitments and then negotiated when they got home imo - you can understand why they have done this at this time tho, to make an impact and it has !!Come on guys, we know how we would react if our salaries were cut by 60% without our consent. I know this is about representing the country, but you have got to be able to relate to this.
Unless BCCI actually sue for losses then the BCCI have been entirely in the right for the first time ever.The ability to blame the BCCI on absolutely everything and anything on full show here.
When you blame BCCI on stuff that isn't their fault, it dilutes the noise for genuine complaints about the organisation.
The tipping point was when the WICB refused to negotiate with anyone but the WIPA.
As soon as Bravo's letter was received there should have been direct talks with the players.
The abandonment of the tour is nothing but a short term prickish move by the players. Are they getting messed around? Perhaps but their own union is central to this. They needed to see out the tour and air their grievances afterwards in a professional manner. This is a disaster. There is a few quid to make on an India tour and good BCCI relations are pretty important. These actions will have long term financial effects for WICB and players. If I was BCCI, I wouldnt deal with WI cricket in any form unless I had to.
I think Hendrix makes a telling point here. They did air their grievances in a professional manner. And were told very firmly, according to Michael Holding, that there was not going to be any negotiation on this. There was no assurance whatsoever of a negotiation given to the players.Yes, it is very hard on the players. IMO, upon receiving the player's initial complaint regarding not being informed about the fees reduction, the WICB should have agreed to pay their previous wages until the end of the tour. Hammering out a new long term agreement then could have been done after the series ended, but before the tour of SA. Having said that, I do feel that many of WI players involved in the strike will come to regret their actions in the coming years.
Not BCCI's fault as such but if I was in the BCCI I would have made damn sure the players received their 1 or 2m so that I received my 65m.The ability to blame the BCCI on absolutely everything and anything on full show here.
When you blame BCCI on stuff that isn't their fault, it dilutes the noise for genuine complaints about the organisation.
Yeah this is what I'm wondering about too. Obviously India would get most of the moolanh, but how are West Indies that broke. 60% paycuts? smhMy other issue is how can it be that a bi-lateral series can generate these sort of funds but one of the teams competing can't even afford to pay their players?
The Holding article suggests that it's not a matter of not being able to pay them and more a matter of seeking revenge against a deal made a while ago which they weren't happy with.Yeah but how are West Indies not getting enough to even pay their guys? That's like the bare minimum. And doesn't the CPL t20 league give them some money?
Complete ****-up/lack of communicationBut really, how in the hell did Wavell Hinds end up signing in favour of that pay cut?
Maybe he signed a WAIVE(LL)RBut really, how in the hell did Wavell Hinds end up signing in favour of that pay cut?
In HINDSight this seems a bad move by him.But really, how in the hell did Wavell Hinds end up signing in favour of that pay cut?
Maybe he signed a WAIVE(LL)R
You know how to make puns! BravoIn HINDSight this seems a bad move by him.