Oh come on, the bowling attack doesn't look that bad. Collymore, Taylor and Powell are good bowlers. And if Edwards can rediscover the form he was in at the start of 2006, it's a bigger asset. Not sure why Ravi Rampaul and Darren Sammy are in there ahead of Pedro Collins and Amit Jaggernauth/Dave Mohammed though.Their bowling attack looks dire and they have even dropped Samuels, so IMO WI would surely have a rough time during their tour of England [especially in test matches].
"Always", if your memory only extends to the mid90s.West Indies cricket has always been like this they take one step forward and then they take two steps back.
Two gun names tbh.Oh come on, the bowling attack doesn't look that bad. Collymore, Taylor and Powell are good bowlers. And if Edwards can rediscover the form he was in at the start of 2006, it's a bigger asset. Not sure why Ravi Rampaul and Darren Sammy are in there ahead of Pedro Collins and Amit Jaggernauth/Dave Mohammed though.
Flintoff is the man who truly separates the England and West Indies bowling attacks IMO.
Though Jaggernauth is the kind of player who could conceivably never play for the West Indies, no matter how well he performs for Trinidad and Tobago.Two gun names tbh.
Bennett King is currently in the process of re-establishing the academy as his last duty. Supposed to be opened again by around June. And the FC competition is around 5 games each.What is the state of the WI academy and it's domestic competition? It really needs to realize the talent of it's players. Chris Gayle and Jerome Taylor spring to mind.
How on earth can you call Daren Powell a "good" bowler when he's had an awful start to his test career?.Oh come on, the bowling attack doesn't look that bad. Collymore, Taylor and Powell are good bowlers
.
Doesn't mean he's a good bowler.Let's see if he can bowl like he did at the WC for a sustained length of time.Going off how he's bowled in recent months I'd expect.
And if you have better players to pick, your chances of picking them in the first place will be greatly increased.Well obviously if you pick the better players then your chances of winning will be increased.
He bowled well in FC too last season.Just because D.Powell bowled well in odi games (recently) that doesn't mean he would do the same in test matches.
Because I, unlike you, have seen a lot of him in domestic cricket.How on earth can you call Daren Powell a "good" bowler when he's had an awful start to his test career?.
That is domestic cricket.This is a test series against the 2nd best side and the gap is unquestionably huge.Because I, unlike you, have seen a lot of him in domestic cricket.
Thanks for isolating the first line of my post then saying exactly what I said in the rest of it.That is domestic cricket.This is a test series against the 2nd best side and the gap is unquestionably huge.
Smooth.Thanks for isolating the first line of my post then saying exactly what I said in the rest of it.
Exactly, Samuels would in my West Indies squad. More than likely he would make my first choice XI to, but obviously the selectors weren't too impressed with his attitude.And if you have better players to pick, your chances of picking them in the first place will be greatly increased.
Really though, I don't care how many chances Samuels has been given - he's still a lot more likely to score runs than Joseph IMO. I'd fully understand if he wasn't in the first choice XI, but he should be in the squad. The same goes for Mohammed and Collins.