Oh they do, and there's plenty in World Cricket (particularly the One Day form)age_master said:im not going to go on about this but - If watson isn't an all rounder - they dont exist anywhere
So how come his captains have only ever given him an average of 5 overs or so a game throughout his one day career?furious_ged said:For sure. Watson is a good bowler. He's a 10 over bowler.
Relevance to One Day Cricket?age_master said:FC batting average of 41 and bowling 25...
I don't see how - Harvey is a specialist bowler who can swing the bat to good effect on occasion.Slow Love™ said:On the Harvey/Watson issue. I think that it's possible that Watson will eventually replace Harvey, mainly because Harvey just isn't cutting it as an all-rounder.
Right now, Michael Clarke is batting at number 7, as does Adam Gilchrist in tests. What's your point? While acknowledging that Harvey's a better bowler than a lot of posters are giving him credit for, I do believe that Watson presents more all-round promise. So did the Australian selectors before Watson was injured and Harvey replaced him in the World Cup tour party.marc71178 said:I don't see how - Harvey is a specialist bowler who can swing the bat to good effect on occasion.
If you replace him with Watson, Watson will be batting down at 8!
Pratyush said:My prediction for today - India will lose to Zimbabwe. It has no relaion to Dravid getting out right now as I have felt the hunch right from the beginning of the match.
Predictions need not come true and I wouldnt even want this one to come true as I want India to win but I do think Zimbabwe will win this one.
I'll throw another one in: Ervine.marc71178 said:Oh they do, and there's plenty in World Cricket (particularly the One Day form)
Gayle
Pollock
Kallis
Flintoff
Streak
The funny thing is, Zimbabwe aren't actually doing that bad, and Pratyush stands a chance of being right... :Orajat said:HOW FUNNY