There's not much point in him being the opener unless he (a) goes after the bowling a little more, or (b) bats through the innings.
It's a little difficult to criticise his run of scores this season forgetting that he was the one who DIDN'T get out in the early overs on quite a few occasions. Yet you found a way. Nice. For interest, his scores in this series have been 60, 0, 19, 52, 82, 25, 11 and 56 tonight. 4 50s, avg about 38 at a strike-rate of about 70 which has been consistent through most of his innings. Four 50's striking at 70 are decent numbers for a player of his type. The point? It's pretty clear he's being asked to do a job. See, in the real world, players sometimes have to compromise their natural instincts and do the ugly work so that more attacking players around them can have their fun later. Katich, as he's shown at state and Test level, has shots all 'round the ground when in the mood (without being as attacking a player as, say, Clarke) yet he's been a little more conservative this year so that would ordinarily tell you something, wouldn't it?
His batting (especially in the first match in Adelaide) tended to be of the 'steady-the-ship' variety which, just as Australia could have been wobbling, made the rest of the innings look easy. His success in 'only' getting to 50 has done nothing more than cover-up Gilchrist's (bar two excellent knocks) Ponting, Clarke, Symonds and Martyn's (when under pressure of a chase) sub-standard form this year. Yes, in the WC in the West Indies, small grounds and fast outfields mean big scores. But, as has been shown in the WI for many, many years, there have also been a bunch of VERY low scores because teams have tried going for the fence too early, having stacked their sides with hitters. You need at least one player who's going to steady the ship in the face of early wickets so that hitters later in the order can take advantage of the recovery (enter Huss/Clarke/Hopes). The WI had this for years in Sherwin Campbell, for example. It's pretty clear which role Kat is being groomed for. Sure, a Jacques/Gilchrist 100+ partnership inside 15 overs would be speccy. But so would a collapse to 4/not many which can and has happened in the WI for years. Just not a good type of speccy.........
Moreover, I think our performance tonight demonstrates that perhaps we need to look outside the current squad for bowlers who can bowl at the end of the innings. To that end, Shaun Tait would be one chap that I'd draft into the team at the first available opportunity.
Now, I love (platonically, Voltman) Shaun as much as the next guy but he doesn't even do this role for SA. Shaun is NOT a death bowler. Shaun may take a few poles but he may also go for 8-an-over. Drafting in Dizzy might be an idea, though. Not that I'm biased.