Jono
Virat Kohli (c)
You can't even compare them. The Madrid final Federer won was after Nadal had played a 4 hour epic against Novak the previous day. Not to mention it became obvious Nadal wasn't 100% when he didn't play Wimbledon after the French. Don't forget the Madrid tournament was the last Masters 1000 heading into the French in 2009.
And the Hamburg final was, as acknowledged by Robbie Koenig plenty of times, again when Nadal had played way more tennis than Federer coming into it and he basically stopped in that third set.
Of course those wins by Federer are still very good (as is any win on clay against Nadal), but they are not as brilliant as Novak's where he has beaten Nadal in straight sets twice when he is completely fresh. In fact, in Rome Novak was the one who had the right to be fatigued and instead he came out and blitzed it.
And the Hamburg final was, as acknowledged by Robbie Koenig plenty of times, again when Nadal had played way more tennis than Federer coming into it and he basically stopped in that third set.
Of course those wins by Federer are still very good (as is any win on clay against Nadal), but they are not as brilliant as Novak's where he has beaten Nadal in straight sets twice when he is completely fresh. In fact, in Rome Novak was the one who had the right to be fatigued and instead he came out and blitzed it.
Last edited: