Jono
Virat Kohli (c)
You're the one who keeps on going on about Wimbledon like it's the be all and end all of tennis. If Henin is a failure for never winning Wimbledon, then Serena is an underachiever for not having anywhere near the same drive as other top players and never truly dominating the sport outside of 2002-03. What has Serena done since 2003 that's been so impressive? Showed up and won some slams? Held the World No.1 for a couple of weeks at a time? Lost at 19 Grand Slam events?
At her peak, Henin was better than Serena. She had the Grand Slams and World No.1 to prove it. Claiming otherwise is like saying Nadal wasn't better than Federer during his time as No.1. Let's not forget that when Henin retired, Serena only had one more Grand Slam than Henin and 2008-09 were not vintage years for women's tennis.
So would you say Nadal is the tennis player of the 2000s? Of course not. So even if Henin was at her peak better than Serena, what does she have to show for it that Serena doesn't?You're the one who keeps on going on about Wimbledon like it's the be all and end all of tennis. If Henin is a failure for never winning Wimbledon, then Serena is an underachiever for not having anywhere near the same drive as other top players and never truly dominating the sport outside of 2002-03. What has Serena done since 2003 that's been so impressive? Showed up and won some slams? Held the World No.1 for a couple of weeks at a time? Lost at 19 Grand Slam events?
At her peak, Henin was better than Serena. She had the Grand Slams and World No.1 to prove it. Claiming otherwise is like saying Nadal wasn't better than Federer during his time as No.1. Let's not forget that when Henin retired, Serena only had one more Grand Slam than Henin and 2008-09 were not vintage years for women's tennis.
And even then, you have not said one reason why Henin is better overall. Not one. Look back at your last few posts.
And lol @ you paying out Serena for showing up and winning Slams like its a negative. Better for her to lose?
To even suggest that the best player this decade was better than someone who has won more slams, on different surfaces, is crazy. Plus she has more come back wins from the death than Henin.
Do I need to remind you of:
After watching the final, looks like despite Kim and Justine's breaks, they still can't close out matchesHate to say I told you so but...
![]()
Unbelievable comeback from Serena in the Sony Ericsson Miami final!! She was paying $3.90 after she lost the first set, and without any hesitation I jumped right on. Henin was twice up a break in the 2nd set, and not only served for the match, but had 2 match points and as usual, could not put Serena away. Once again when it comes down to the pressure moments of the match, the clutch points, Henin cannot deliver against Serena.
So happy with that bet... honestly when Serena is on she's unstoppable. Best women's tennis player going around IMO... comfortably, and if she continues to actually give a crap, she'll be no. 1 again in no time.
![Ph34r :ph34r: :ph34r:](/forum/images/smilies/original/ph34r.gif)
Kim lead a set and 4-1 in the 2nd, and then 5-1 in the 3rd set tie-break and still struggled... and Henin served for the match and had 2 match points.
Dayum.
Good to have them back still, but they ain't better than Serena.