a) relevance? you said she chokes when it counts...so 4 french opens don't count because they were on clay? she has 2 on hard courts as well in addition to the 2 wimbledon finals, shows that she is a top competitor on the quicker courts as well...
We've been through this many times, and I thought it was proven earlier this year when Henin was all over Serena in the Miami finals, taking the first set 6-0, and was up a break in the 2nd, and couldn't serve out the match, and ended up losing. Wimbledon was the first time Henin ever beat Serena on a non-clay surface.
And the relevance of winning 4 of the grand slam titles at Roland Garros on clay is obvious when it comes to her mental toughness. She's easily the best clay court women's player in the world. When you're that good, and not challenged as much (as this year showed) you don't have to win as many clutch points. You're the best.
On other surfaces though, she has choked countless times and at 5-1 up in the 3rd set vs. Serena Williams at Wimbledon she even struggled to serve it out, being broken first before eventually winning.
The fact she's supposedly the best women's tennis player in the world, yet can't win Wimbledon says something pretty damn obvious to me. The Williams sisters are better on non-clay surfaces. Its as simple as that.
b) i don't know her career record against venus but she is 5-6 against serena and beat her at both roland garros and wimbledon this year....of course according to serena, she lost, henin didn't win...
As I pointed out, she's only ever beaten Serena in a non-clay surface Grand Slam once, and that was this year's Wimbledon. Then she goes and loses to Bartoli, which is a dead set joke. Venus had a far tougher path into the final.
Her career record vs. Venus Williams is 7-1 in Venus' favour by the way. So probably better Henin lost to Bartoli.