• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* T20 and ODI matches

Howe_zat

Audio File
Rather than have a new ball from each end, it would be nice to get a new one proper at 30 overs or so.

I suppose it's to these two's credit that they've got up to something even remotely defendable but Christ this is dull.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
Swann was tight but it's not a lot to applaud to go for 3 an over when the the opposition don't want any more. 10 overs wicketless, from the position we were in, is pretty disappointing.
 

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah, India would have taken those figures given he would end the spell at 40 overs,if offered when he came to bowl.
 

Jacknife

International Captain
Swann was tight but it's not a lot to applaud to go for 3 an over when the the opposition don't want any more. 10 overs wicketless, from the position we were in, is pretty disappointing.
What do you think he could have bowled better?
 

MW1304

Cricketer Of The Year
Hard for Swann to have done much else.

Just needed to get one of these two out sooner and they wouldn't have lasted, going to be a defendable score now. Praveen will be all over the openers.
 

Top