• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* T20 and ODI matches

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
To me England under-value late over batting. It's just as important if not moreso than the 10-40 over phase. Most of England's side could come in at say the 16th over and milk some runs, if you took the batting powerplay then I think it would help Bell (and someone like Broad/Swann) get in, you'd give them half a dozen balls first but it would help them get going I think.
It's not so much late over batting as aggressive batting in general. To an extent it's a product of the system- the English value tests too much for someone with a technique as suited to ODIs as MS Dhoni's to emerge. But for a long time they just didn't seem to think scoring quickly mattered at all. Commentators and pundits are finally moving away from Boycott syndrome (the notion that getting out playing an attacking stroke is an inherently greater sin than getting out playing a defensive stroke) but frustratingly slowly, and they still often fail to resist the urge to label a shot "silly" or "stupid" when it doesn't come off. It's a problem that visibly affects the team- most notably on their visit to India in '08 when they were whitewashed settling for 260~ scores on 300+ pitches against a side with a monster batting lineup but somewhat hittable attack. That said, at the last World T20, England were the most positive team with the bat when other sides were erring by taking too long to rebuild or failing to rotate the strike. So it does at least look like things are changing for the better under Flower.

On a related note, the selectors are still far too attached to members of the test squad. Hussain repeatedly states that "your best players are normally your best players in all formats" and it seems to be an area where English selectors repeatedly make huge mistakes. I still can't quite believe Matt Prior went to the World Cup.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
On a related note, the selectors are still far too attached to members of the test squad. Hussain repeatedly states that "your best players are normally your best players in all formats" and it seems to be an area where English selectors repeatedly make huge mistakes. I still can't quite believe Matt Prior went to the World Cup.
While it's obviously to certain extent, Hussain is by and large correct.
 

zaremba

Cricketer Of The Year
Funnily enough the guy who would suit that finisher role would be KP, he can milk the runs as well as hit the long ball.
Yeah but there's an unshakeable orthodoxy that He Must Bat High Up The Order and for some reason he, and the England team, have given in to it. I'm not convinced by it. There's no shame in being a middle order batsman, even if you aspire to be the team's best player. KP started as a specialist number 5 and I don't see any reason why he shouldn't always bat there in both Tests and ODIs.

In Tests I'd have Bell at 4 and KP at 5.
In ODIs I'd be looking for Bell to go in at 3 (or maybe even open) and KP either at 4 or, preferably, 5.
 

Jacknife

International Captain
Yeah but there's an unshakeable orthodoxy that He Must Bat High Up The Order and for some reason he, and the England team, have given in to it. I'm not convinced by it. There's no shame in being a middle order batsman, even if you aspire to be the team's best player. KP started as a specialist number 5 and I don't see any reason why he shouldn't always bat there in both Tests and ODIs.

In Tests I'd have Bell at 4 and KP at 5.
In ODIs I'd be looking for Bell to go in at 3 (or maybe even open) and KP either at 4 or, preferably, 5.
I agree with what your saying as far as being put down to come in at No5 in one day cricket would look like a demotion but I defo think it could be sold as a, your the best man for the job and for the team to go to the next level, you can be that go to finisher.

In tests I think KP in at 4 is right but it comes down to where to best use Bell, ideally he would be best at 3 but of course Trott has made that his home. I think atm there's no need tinker but there's always that possibility there to change if the need arises.

Tbh Bell in one day cricket I'm yet to be convinced and with KP missing this series, it will be the ideal time to show what he can do, where I presume he will take KP's four spot.
I'm really still not sure about Cook & Trott in the top 3 and this is where England could and should be more flexible, depending on the game situation.
 

kiwiviktor81

International Debutant
What's the likely Indian lineup for the ODIs? Will they open with Patel or maybe even Dravid, given that Gambhir and Sehwag are out?
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
Yeah but there's an unshakeable orthodoxy that He Must Bat High Up The Order and for some reason he, and the England team, have given in to it. I'm not convinced by it. There's no shame in being a middle order batsman, even if you aspire to be the team's best player. KP started as a specialist number 5 and I don't see any reason why he shouldn't always bat there in both Tests and ODIs.

In Tests I'd have Bell at 4 and KP at 5.
In ODIs I'd be looking for Bell to go in at 3 (or maybe even open) and KP either at 4 or, preferably, 5.
I'd quite like to see KP opening in LO matches.
 

TT Boy

Hall of Fame Member
Obviously won’t be but it should be last chance saloon for the likes of Ravi and Bell in the ODIs. Bell is 29 now, had 2 WCs, did **** all of note and after 100+ ODIs still has a poor SR. Less said about Ravi the better. Rather take Luke Wright.
 
Last edited:

nsniks

State Vice-Captain
What's the likely Indian lineup for the ODIs? Will they open with Patel or maybe even Dravid, given that Gambhir and Sehwag are out?
I think they will open with patel, dravid would be in middle order. Rahane could stake a claim in playing XI if he scores a ton in T20 match otherwise I dont see management playing him ahead of patel
 

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
Why don't they send Gambhir back home and call up a replacement early FFS?

Doubtful at the start of the series and still running to doctors and specialist to check and get ready.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
I've been rather pessimistic for England on the limited overs leg, but I'm actually starting to think we might get that over the Indians too now. All I'm hearing from the Indian camp is chaos.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Apparently 4-1 would take us ahead of them in the rankings - that's got to be a possibility you'd think.
 

nsniks

State Vice-Captain
India in England 2011: Concussed Gambhir to return home | Cricket News | England v India 2011 | ESPN Cricinfo

So one day before the T20 match, they finally decide that Gambhir should be sent back. I dont understand why this decision was not made few days back atleast a replacement could have been sent and atleast that guy would have had some practice. Now last minute replacement would be sent and that guy would have had no match practice what so ever.

I am expecting a 5-0 whitewash in the ODI's also
 

Cevno

Hall of Fame Member
Has been a horrific tour for Gambhir, and the Indian selectors and management.

Now Dravid is set to play the T20 ahead of Sachin and Rahane which is odd tstl.
 

Top