tooextracool
International Coach
i'd be interested in seeing how flintoff goes against spinners from both ends today.
Agreed. Not a fan of it at all, especially given it doesn't solve debates about close calls in the slightest. For me, Clarke was not out yesterday, and Inzy was out just a minute ago. No doubt some people here would disagree.Arrow said:This 3rd umpire crap for LBWs is horrible. Totally ruins the spontanety of the sport, is a waste of time, and most of the time its still inconclusive. If its brought in, every decent LBW appeal will be checked.
I agree, I also thought he was a goner.aussie said:top class umpiring form Taufel, live Freddie looked dead
Clarke's decision was a bit mystifying.FaaipDeOiad said:Agreed. Not a fan of it at all, especially given it doesn't solve debates about close calls in the slightest. For me, Clarke was not out yesterday, and Inzy was out just a minute ago. No doubt some people here would disagree.
what a surprise, kallis gets himself out to warne again, following the trend of his career.tooextracool said:hardly surprising that kallis seems to have no clue as to what is coming out of shane warnes hand.
He lacks Warne's subtle variation and of course his incredibly accuracy, but so does just about every other spinner you could care to name. Macgill's wrong'un is actually better than Warne's (these days, that is). He's not as good as Warne or Murali, and probably not as good as Kumble either, but he's definately not a poor bowler like many people make out, and it is definately true that if he did not play with Warne he would have played many, many tests, and taken a lot of wickets.tooextracool said:in watching macgill bowl with warne so far today, 2 things have stood out:
1) the 1-2 long hops every over has continued
2) the lack of variation, particularly the lack of drift of macgill.
as such i dont think macgill is a particularly poor bowler, i think hes decent-good, but its glaringly obvious that against a quality batting side against spin he'd struggle to bowl too many people out.
You cant compare him to Warne as their different in their approach.tooextracool said:in watching macgill bowl with warne so far today, 2 things have stood out:
1) the 1-2 long hops every over has continued
2) the lack of variation, particularly the lack of drift of macgill.
as such i dont think macgill is a particularly poor bowler, i think hes decent-good, but its glaringly obvious that against a quality batting side against spin he'd struggle to bowl too many people out.
Slow Love™ said:This match is unfortunately petering out to a foregone conclusion. It's difficult to see this concept surviving as a regular event after this mostly lacklustre performance from the World XI this series, unless something incredible happens in the second half of the match.
Yep, they totally buggered up the Boucher decision.Blaze said:It would help if the on field umpires would use the 3rd umpire a bit more ensuring the right decision is made. I mean what a joke, they bring this system in to eliminate bad decisions and they still manage to **** it up.
In other news today in my game the opposition needed 15 runs with 4 wickets in hand, 10 overs to go and I took all 4 wickets in one over. Best individual performance of my career. I am stoked, especially as I got a 5th ball duck batting at 3 earlier in the day, not before being hit in the chest with a nasty short ball. Revenge is sweet.
Thanks, yeah best over of my life.Slow Love™ said:Congrats on your bowling performance, mate - that's some over.
oh i agree, i dont think macgill is a poor bowler either. and yes he'd have taken more wickets were warne not playing. but hes not a great/world class bowler that people make him out to be, and if you watch him for an extended period its extremely obvious. a large proportion of his deliveries today were very very wide of off stump. some were full tosses, others were too short. as far as him being as accurate as just about every other spinner to same, i'd guarantee you that almost every finger spinner is more accurate than him, as are kumble and murali.FaaipDeOiad said:He lacks Warne's subtle variation and of course his incredibly accuracy, but so does just about every other spinner you could care to name. Macgill's wrong'un is actually better than Warne's (these days, that is). He's not as good as Warne or Murali, and probably not as good as Kumble either, but he's definately not a poor bowler like many people make out, and it is definately true that if he did not play with Warne he would have played many, many tests, and taken a lot of wickets.