• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official** Sri Lanka in New Zealand

Fiery

Banned
Sri Lanka are a classy one-day unit (unbeknown to our pea-brained selectors). We are stuck with the same team of inexperience pie-chuckers and hobbits for this next game so I'm writing that game off already. I can't see why 2 spinners can't be played so would bring in Patel for Mason and tell Mason "don't call us, we'll call you".

When we get Fleming and Bond back we will take the series 3-2 however.
 

James

Cricket Web Owner
Fiery said:
Sri Lanka are a classy one-day unit (unbeknown to our pea-brained selectors). We are stuck with the same team of inexperience pie-chuckers and hobbits for this next game so I'm writing that game off already. I can't see why 2 spinners can't be played so would bring in Patel for Mason and tell Mason "don't call us, we'll call you".

When we get Fleming and Bond back we will take the series 3-2 however.
Couldn't agree more, Jeetan Patel has impressed all since he came on the scene and we leave him out for the likes of Mason/Adams, and even Gillespie. Seems very bizzare, especially as Patel is a useful death bowler.
 

Matt52

U19 Vice-Captain
McMillan has been called into the side so who is going to open?Maybe give James Marshall one more chance..

B McCullum
J Marshall
R Taylor
C McMillan
P Fulton
H Marshall
D Vettori
J Franklin
A Adams
M Mason
M Gillespie.

That team looks a bit rough doesnt it, but its the best from the selected squad. Also, I think the bowlers, Adams, Mason, and Gillespie, need to be given another go. Just to be sure that it wasnt just nerves that led to that performance last week.

Prediction

A Adams 10 overs, 0/65............... subsequently dropped
M Mason 10 overs 1/74................... as above.
M Gillespie 10 overs 3/40 .............. shows he is worth keeping.
 

Sir Redman

State Vice-Captain
marc71178 said:
I very much doubt you'd see all 6 of those would you?

Add McCullum and there's only room for 4 batsmen.
Ah, but Jake's a genuine allrounder while Dan's gapping ability allows him to take advantage of slow fielders, which lets us play them in the middle order to make the most of their skill set. [/John Bracewell mode]
 

Sir Redman

State Vice-Captain
Matt52 said:
McMillan has been called into the side so who is going to open?Maybe give James Marshall one more chance..

B McCullum
J Marshall
R Taylor
C McMillan
P Fulton
H Marshall
D Vettori
J Franklin
A Adams
M Mason
M Gillespie.
Astle?
 

JASON

Cricketer Of The Year
I feel the Criticism against the entire NZ bowling attack a bit harsh.

When you play too many newcomers or inexperienced guys together you are setting themselves up to fail, IMO.

The presence of a Bond or Mills may make the same bowling attack look different on any other day.

This is why the rotational policy the way its being implemented by Bracewell is flawed.

The correct rotational policy would be to play one or two triallists (Mason or Gillespie) with Bond/ Mills + Oram. So you have the experience 2 of the top guys with 2 newcomers/trialllists. The wrong way to do as it was done yesterday is to rest Bond, while the other 2 are injured and play a totally new quartret of seamers who have never before played together .

That is a recipe for disaster. That is like setting them to fail and destroying their confidance for good. That's the wrong way to implement rotational policy, IMO.
 

JASON

Cricketer Of The Year
_Ed_ said:
J Marshall lbw Vaas 0 (1)

Perhaps bringing an end to the James Marshall comeback.
TBH I thought that decision by Tony Hill was something that could've gone in batsman's favour on another day. There are days when those decisions are decided in batsman's favour giving the batter the benefit of the doubt .

But Tony Hill compensated for this 2 balls later , by giving a decision the other way.:)
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
JASON said:
TBH I thought that decision by Tony Hill was something that could've gone in batsman's favour on another day. There are days when those decisions are decided in batsman's favour giving the batter the benefit of the doubt .

But Tony Hill compensated for this 2 balls later , by giving a decision the other way.:)
Wouldn't have mattered - JM just would have got out second ball if he was given not out anyway.
 

dinu23

International Debutant
Matt52 said:
McMillan has been called into the side so who is going to open?Maybe give James Marshall one more chance..

B McCullum
J Marshall
R Taylor
C McMillan
P Fulton
H Marshall
D Vettori
J Franklin
A Adams
M Mason
M Gillespie.

That team looks a bit rough doesnt it, but its the best from the selected squad. Also, I think the bowlers, Adams, Mason, and Gillespie, need to be given another go. Just to be sure that it wasnt just nerves that led to that performance last week.

Prediction

A Adams 10 overs, 0/65............... subsequently dropped
M Mason 10 overs 1/74................... as above.
M Gillespie 10 overs 3/40 .............. shows he is worth keeping.
oh no! not mcmillan again! how many chances does this guy need to prove himself?
 

Fiery

Banned
Sir Redman said:
Ah, but Jake's a genuine allrounder while Dan's gapping ability allows him to take advantage of slow fielders, which lets us play them in the middle order to make the most of their skill set. [/John Bracewell mode]
John Mitchwell
 
Last edited:

meatspx

U19 Cricketer
I would have barfed if I knew Craig McMillan was going to play again for NZ 1 year ago, but his selection is justified.

Who knows, maybe he's been burnt abbit too much for his liking, being out of the international side for so long. As a result he will be more responsible, value his wicket more.....bat more as a specialist batsman. I always thought he had the potential to be a good player if he consigned himself to playing in the 'V' early on in his innings.

The Napier ODI was a success to me, even after the bowling display. For a guy like Ross Taylor to prove himself to the selectors, thus guarantee selection for the rest of the series and probably the Commonwealth ODI series in Aus, is a big positive. He need a positive player in our side.

Just kick out J Marshall (just because your identical twin can bat at international level without a decent 1st class career doesn't me you can), and A Adams who seems to bowl too short and can't bowl at the death (I'm not sure why he was labelled a 'death' specialist, he doesn't have a length at all).

I think Mason should be given another chance, and certainly Gillespie can bowl...(take out his no ball problem and his first 2 overs, then you have potential).

Franklin can't bowl in ODIs unfortunaly, but will be selected in our side no matter what. (Fleming & Bracewell: he's a guy for the future). I wouldn't mind either O'Brien or later on Tuffey when he was match practice to be given a go too, but it's getting a bit too close to try much more.....we need a settled side soon. After all if we can't find a fourth seamer behind Oram/Bond/Mills then we should definately play Patel in every match, even if it's not a pitch suited to seam bowling. If he's the better bowler, then he should be given a chance.
 

James

Cricket Web Owner
Some good points metaspx, I would like to see a bowling attack of Bond/Mills/Oram/Vettori/Patel/Astle/Styris myself. I think you've got enough there to get through 50 overs and gives you a fairly balanced lineup.

Astle
Fleming
Taylor
Styris
Fulton/McMillan
Oram
McCullum
Vettori
Mills
Bond
Patel
 

Sir Redman

State Vice-Captain
Matt52 said:
Should have been more clear...McMillan has been called in to cover for Astle because Astle has some sort of injury, he may play or may not,
Yeah, forgot that. Most reports I've read say he's only there as "cover" which suggests to me that Astle's still expected to play.
 

Halfpast_Yellow

U19 Vice-Captain
Saw the game live :)

I would have those players also. I'm actually quite interested to see how McMillian returns. In that regard Astle's injury is quite fortuitous, as long as it's not serious. He showed that he still has it to make good scores, his runout was a real stroke of badluck for him.

Fulton played okay I thought. He is quite raw at this level though and doesn't handle Murali well. Should get better with experience. With luck either him or McMillian will be sorted in the team by the time the WC rolls around.

This series may be useful to try out McCullum at the top but he should be the backup opener in my mind once we get Astle and Fleming back together for the following series, because the order gets unbalanced with him pushed up. However if he takes to it well over the next four games, then we could end up playing something like.

Astle
McCullum
Taylor
Fleming
Styris
McMillian(Fulton)
Oram
Vettori
Mills
Bond
Patel/Gillespie

Oram is a mystery. I'm not sure where he should be. In his best form, his ODI bowling was fantastic, and at one point he looked to have developed a good slogging technique with him clearing his hip. But other days I get the impression he really needs to play him self in a bit. I guess if he doesn't come right in the above team, pull him out and have Gillespie/Patel/Franklin fighting over two spots in the lower 5.
 

dinu23

International Debutant
my SL team for the next game:
sanath
tharanga
mahela
sanga
marvan
dilshan/kapugedara
chamara
maharoof for dilhara
vaas
malinga
murali
 

dinu23

International Debutant
Fiery said:
Sri Lanka are a classy one-day unit (unbeknown to our pea-brained selectors). We are stuck with the same team of inexperience pie-chuckers and hobbits for this next game so I'm writing that game off already. I can't see why 2 spinners can't be played so would bring in Patel for Mason and tell Mason "don't call us, we'll call you".

When we get Fleming and Bond back we will take the series 3-2 however.
you think Fleming and Bond will be good enough to win matches on their own?
bond may have a good influence but I don't think Flemings' inclusion will make a big difference, if any.
 

Top