Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
Coincidence, I'm fairly confident.bryce said:you wouldn't think so, but look at sinclair's record and i'm sure you'll agree with me.
Why should there be any real difference?
Coincidence, I'm fairly confident.bryce said:you wouldn't think so, but look at sinclair's record and i'm sure you'll agree with me.
yeah he's doing well domestically, but at 30 years of age do we want to bring him in for a season or 2????????? I'd rather look at Gillespie or Thompson........bryce said:i've heard worse ideas, that track he got 7/28 on the other day was 'quite a good pitch' apparently, infact i heard that straight out of nick horsley's mouth
The opposite is definitely not true though IMO.Richard said:There's not that much difference between three and four; someone who is a three shouldn't have too many problems at four.
Seems a pretty good Team to me !!anzac said:so I'd expect.............
How, Sinclair, Fleming, Styris, Astle, Oram, McCullum, Vettori, Franklin, Mills, Tuffey.............
but if Styris or Astle struggle then perhaps an opportunity for someone from the latter group to get a chance - although unlikely IMO unless the top order is really on fire.............
yes so overall they are average, which is precisely the point. and please remind me where this series is taking place home or away?Richard said:Oh, yes, but they're not fairly average.
They're either extremely good (at home) or almost-without-fail-downright-poor (away).
Average is somewhere in the middle, which they don't tend to be very often.
i might be alone here i'd rather see adams given a go in the tests ahead of mills, he's a very good bowler in NZ conditions but is seen as a one day specialist because of his skill set, he probaly hasn't earnt it yet especially since mills got a five-for, but if he stays amongst the wickets i don't think he would make too badder test bowler.anzac said:so I'd expect.............
How, Sinclair, Fleming, Styris, Astle, Oram, McCullum, Vettori, Franklin, Mills, Tuffey.............
but if Styris or Astle struggle then perhaps an opportunity for someone from the latter group to get a chance - although unlikely IMO unless the top order is really on fire.............
Stryris has got to come at #5 or #6 after Astle.Styris is much better at these positions.anzac said:ok so based upon the domestic form to date.....
*Papps has yet to post double figures - not the form for selection IMO;
*How racks up his 3rd ton on the trot - #1 for me..........;
*Sinclair opens with him and also scores a ton V Tuffey & Butler - probably got him consigned to #2 spot for mind.........;
*Mills grabs 5 for.........;
*Franklin gets 4 as does Adams....;
*Butler gets pasted..........;
*Macca does nothing.......;
*Vincent, Fulton, Taylor, Stewart & Ryder have also been amongst the runs while not dominating the scoring to date..........
so I'd expect.............
How, Sinclair, Fleming, Styris, Astle, Oram, McCullum, Vettori, Franklin, Mills, Tuffey.............
but if Styris or Astle struggle then perhaps an opportunity for someone from the latter group to get a chance - although unlikely IMO unless the top order is really on fire.............
How will never get in to the OD team even if he is selected to the squad.Kent said:Does anyone think there's a chance Jamie How could be called in at the expense of McMillan or replacing Harris when the OD squad for SL is named this week?
I realise it would still be hard for him to get on the park (Fleming, Astle, Sinclair, Styris, Marshall, Oram and Cairns looks like a pretty solid top 7, with Styris' bowling helping his cause) but just being in the camp could perhaps take the edge off mentally for How if they are looking at playing him in tests this summer.