And I think the other 5 are more dangerous because of that. Finn is average.It's the bounce though that the likes of KW has proven to be susceptible to.
In tests maybe, but in ODIs he's proven.It's the bounce though that the likes of KW has proven to be susceptible to.
5 minutes is about the length of time we've been considered amongst the top 4 prospects for the WC. It's no coincidence.Williamson is our best ODI batsman for about 5 minutes guys. Settle down.
We've probably never had this many 'good' ODI batsman in the team at once, obviously losing out on someone who looks like they may become our best ever is rough, but it's hardly game over.
Possibly, but everyone else might be brittle against Southee and McClenaghan. It's swings and roundabouts to some extent.I wish I shared this optimism. I tend to think that NZ might be brittle against the likes of Steyn & Morkel, Finn & Broad, Starc & Johnson.
I have to disagree. Mahela is fantastic in guiding an innings in the middle of the innings. So great at rotating the strike and pinching sneaky runs all over the field. The innings doesn't get bogged down in the middle overs when he is batting. He may not be a big hitter, but he is fantastic to have in that 15-40 over period.Because it's much better to have Mahela in the early and middle overs than Dimuth or Thirimanne or whoever else.
No real proof that Mahela is a great finisher, there's proof that he does well starting though. Thiri is meh wherever you put him. More likely to waste overs coming early on.
I think Vettori has the wood on him, just my 2 cents =PI have to disagree. Mahela is fantastic in guiding an innings in the middle of the innings. So great at rotating the strike and pinching sneaky runs all over the field. The innings doesn't get bogged down in the middle overs when he is batting. He may not be a big hitter, but he is fantastic to have in that 15-40 over period.
current form Guptill vs Southee or Mills must be hilarious...The batsman do face our bowlers regularly I would think and they're not too bad.
i can see where your'e coming from in terms of giving our best players the early overs but it also can go against us in terms of the fact that if the ball is swinging a mile at first when its hard and then calms down as it softens then we want to keep our best players away from that also surely? I still maintain that for me, thirri and dilshan are the best odi opening partnership we have at present and where we struggle is the lower middle order(proved by the fact that these guys probably havent collectively scored double figures for a while now)we need to either add a genuine bowler to give us some death over bowling or add a specialist batsman at 7 to shorten the tail..His overall record vs his opening record says that when he opens he makes 10 more runs at a +10 strike rate. He just made a couple of big scores recently which doesn't change the fact that he prefers opening (he said so himself in the India series) and he has a better record there (and can make a bigger impact). All this "SL will be too top-heavy" is bull**** imo.. doesn't matter how you set it up, if one of the Big 4 don't fire SL is ****ed anyway, so why not give them the best chance to make an impact?
Vettori and Southee seem certainties. I prefer McClenaghan and Milne to diversify things. Milne may not have the wickets on the board but he's overdue some luck and he has been bowling well. McClenaghan has such a great ability to take wickets it doesn't matter how many runs he concedes. We should have Corey, Elliott and Kane to bowl the extra's when required.it looks like Boult vs Mills, McClenaghan vs Milne, Vettori vs McCullum....Boult is looking good, but I wonder if he beats out Mills whether it favours Milne over Mitch so there are 2 left afters and 2 right armers rather than 3 left armers and southee....Vettori bowled too well last time up to not be in the lineup as well
If Boult can show he can take early wickets and restrict opposition at the death then he might take out Mitch or Mills, I think we won't have Boult and Mitch in the same team...it looks like Boult vs Mills, McClenaghan vs Milne, Vettori vs McCullum....Boult is looking good, but I wonder if he beats out Mills whether it favours Milne over Mitch so there are 2 left afters and 2 right armers rather than 3 left armers and southee....Vettori bowled too well last time up to not be in the lineup as well