False. Vaughan criticised Mathews and Swann said it was perfectly legal.Since 91jmay asked so politely, Michael Vaughan and Graeme Swann have already criticized Sena for the perfectly legitimate runout.
False. Vaughan criticised Mathews and Swann said it was perfectly legal.Since 91jmay asked so politely, Michael Vaughan and Graeme Swann have already criticized Sena for the perfectly legitimate runout.
Point is they are both in the "spirit of the game has been broken" camp when really, Sena did his bit by warning the batsman anyway. How many times do you need to warn the non striker for them to take it seriously? Here are their quotesFalse. Vaughan criticised Mathews and Swann said it was perfectly legal.
Yeah I like to think that the crowd was booing Buttler for being a nincompoop.Mankading is perfectly justifiable.
I wouldn't even give a bloke a warning.
They're basically trying to cheat by leaving their crease early. Run the buggers out.
True, and I was about to say something about class telling and then he gives it away. Didn't see that coming at all.Top fifty for Mahela, such a gun big game player.
Yeah full on bollockhead. I don't listen to TMS, they are jokes.Michael Vaughan is a ****ing idiot. Pretty much disagree with everything he says.
Why is it **** cricket? Shows presence of mind from the bowler. And how is it any different from the non striker getting runout by the old straight drive flicking the bowlers finger onto the stumps dismissal? Both punish the non striker for backing up too far.It is not something I am going to get outraged about but it is just **** cricket.
You can perfectly legitimately argue that if that batsmen did not leave his crease it would never have happen and all that but it is just not something I want to watch people doing on a regular basis.
Can't even get into Kents team and they are ****.Shouldn't he play the Tests?
Tredwell? He doesn't always play in his county's 4-day matches.Shouldn't he play the Tests?