Magrat Garlick
Rather Mad Witch
Sri Lanka gifting Tom Curran a career is it
Rather the problem is two faced. The players who are selected for 50 overs game has to have ability to occupy the crease. The only ones capable of doing it are DDS, Mathews, Chandimal, Karunarathne and Thirimanne. Issue is other than for DDS, all above are very slow against spin. Most of their scoring will be against fast bowling. It complicates more as KJP and Danny boy both suck against spin, and those boys are the big hitters in the side. As a result SL have to play dibbly dobbly no rounders who can bash spinners like Shanaka (TBF to him, he is a crafty seamer), Sekkuge Prasanna or utter crap like Milinda Siriwardane.There no batting talent coming through Sri Lanka this is a problem
I actually don't think this is the issue. I think a lot of players have got plenty of chances to shine but they either haven't made it or are too inconsistent or are nitwits.Pick players who have potential, give them a long rope and create a great team environment - this has been more or less NZ's mantra.
tbf, though, i suppose there's a graded difference between giving young, promising talents a lot of rope or giving, like, lahiru thirimmanne a lot of rope (who to the guy's credit was solid in their last series, but until it's otherwise proven we can put that in the category of "broken clock")I actually don't think this is the issue. I think a lot of players have got plenty of chances to shine but they either haven't made it or are too inconsistent or are nitwits.
Take Kusal Mendis for example. He's definitely got potential and has received loads of chances but he's very inconsistent and acts like a nitwit so chances are high that he doesn't make it.
We're also not helped by selection mistakes, injuries, lack or stars, and having too many nitwits.
It comes down to our talent pool as well. Thirimanne was actually a promising option, he just never worked out (although as you said he seems to have turned that around now). I think it also helps players to come into a more settled side and not the craziness that our current limited overs setup seems to be these days. Oh, and selectors need to make smarter choices as well I think.tbf, though, i suppose there's a graded difference between giving young, promising talents a lot of rope or giving, like, lahiru thirimmanne a lot of rope (who to the guy's credit was solid in their last series, but until it's otherwise proven we can put that in the category of "broken clock")
can lead a horse to water but you can't make it average more than 30 etc