Kumar, Jacques or Lee.Man of the Match? Have to be Jaques I'd say.
Although I'd give it to Lee once again.
Yep, his critics have a lot to answer to.Lee for MOTM again and MOTS easily imo. He's taken 16 wickets on 2 absolute belters, and made all the important breakthroughs, fantastic bowling.
No CKumar, Jaques or Lee.
I'll get used to him in a couple years time I'm sure.No C
Good batting is outlasting the attack. They served up tripe because they were tired, he made them tired. Gun effort.Sanga batted well, yes, but after what was a great morning session, the Aussies served up some tripe to him and the tail, didn't they?
Tired? In the first session? You kid. They bowled rubbish and Sanga made them pay. In no way does it diminish the knock to acknowledge that. So much short stuff to a guy who actually plays it pretty well.Good batting is outlasting the attack. They served up tripe because they were tired, he made them tired. Gun effort.
Mentally or physically tired doesn't really matter to me.Tired? In the first session? You kid. They bowled rubbish and Sanga made them pay. In no way does it diminish the knock to acknowledge that. So much short stuff to a guy who actually plays it pretty well.