biased indian
International Coach
IF SL can get to 400....it will be nice and with wickets still in hand even better.......
Hard to disagree with thisI swear, if that happened, it would be the greatest day in history. There should be a rule where Murali gets 11 chances at batting himself, just for the sheer entertainment factor.
Murali's Maiden Test Match Hundred Lead SL To Historic Victory
"Ahahahahaha **** you Warne." - Murali
p4-12 Is Murali's batting action legal? Australian experts disagree.
p13 Warne spits the bottle.
Murali's Maiden Test Match Hundred Lead SL To Historic Victory
"Ahahahahaha **** you Warne." - Murali
p4-12 Is Murali's batting action legal? Australian experts disagree.
p13 Warne spits the bottle.
No wickets being taken is the wave of the future. Didn't you know that bowlers are just run-restricters? Seriously, where have you been SS?Hmm, I still don't think they have any chance to win.
But if they pull it off, they will have won despite taking only seven wickets in the entire Test! Has any side ever won when taking seven or fewer wickets in a Test match?
Haha that's so good.Murali's Maiden Test Match Hundred Lead SL To Historic Victory
"Ahahahahaha **** you Warne." - Murali
p4-12 Is Murali's batting action legal? Australian experts disagree.
p13 Warne spits the bottle.
would be the best day for me if it happens....better than anything india has done so farMurali's Maiden Test Match Hundred Lead SL To Historic Victory
"Ahahahahaha **** you Warne." - Murali
p4-12 Is Murali's batting action legal? Australian experts disagree.
p13 Warne spits the bottle.
Kolkata in 2001 was special at this level too. If you qualify statement with 'in Australia', 'this year' etc could agree.would be the best day for me if it happens....better than anything india has done so far
Except, they did a terrible job of restricting the runs.No wickets being taken is the wave of the future. Didn't you know that bowlers are just run-restricters? Seriously, where have you been SS?
Well, calm down people. Nothing has happened yet . The odds makers have deemed Sri Lankan to be an 8:1 underdog for a victory, and I think they are being generous to the Lankans.Kolkata in 2001 was special at this level too. If you qualify statement with 'in Australia', 'this year' etc could agree.
Though I would certainly consider myself 'the purest of the purists', I do have enough faith in humanity and the majority of mere purists to believe that they would most certainly not consider 7 T20 games to be equivalent to a Test match.(Though T20I record this year has been completely unexpected too, to be fair to the Indian players. Pajama cricket for sure, but the team has done it for ~ 7-8 games so may add up to one test match, except for the purest of purists.
haha lol Richard said once in his cricketweb award post that we haven't had a funny post for a while. my friend u deserve that award lolMurali's Maiden Test Match Hundred Lead SL To Historic Victory
"Ahahahahaha **** you Warne." - Murali
p4-12 Is Murali's batting action legal? Australian experts disagree.
p13 Warne spits the bottle.
If we're still doing the CW Awards, this one for the Skull. Love how the debate about his batting takes 8 pages.Murali's Maiden Test Match Hundred Lead SL To Historic Victory
"Ahahahahaha **** you Warne." - Murali
p4-12 Is Murali's batting action legal? Australian experts disagree.
p13 Warne spits the bottle.
Dead set one of the funniest posts ever.Murali's Maiden Test Match Hundred Lead SL To Historic Victory
"Ahahahahaha **** you Warne." - Murali
p4-12 Is Murali's batting action legal? Australian experts disagree.
p13 Warne spits the bottle.