• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* South African tour of England and Ireland 2022

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
Lucky for Stokes there aren't too many 5 test series...
Yeah, I'd like to see him find some middle ground between not bowling at all, which helped SA's last 4 wickets treble their team's 1st innings score, and what we've seen today & in SA's 2nd innings at Old Trafford.
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Yeah, I'd like to see him find some middle ground between not bowling at all, which helped SA's last 4 wickets treble their team's 1st innings score, and what we've seen today & in SA's 2nd innings at Old Trafford.
It is a bit reminescent of Flintoff shortening his career to be brave, but hey we'll see.

Umm Lees you are a lucky boy, but not an england opener.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
It is a bit reminescent of Flintoff shortening his career to be brave, but hey we'll see.

Umm Lees you are a lucky boy, but not an england opener.
Yes, I made the same comparison during his marathon spell in the 2nd test. I think Fred's pointless heroics were during the 1st test against SL in 2006, but anyway.

Obviously you're dead right about Lees. And do we really need to risk a run-out?
 

Heboric

International Regular
****ing pathetic, gone for two hours because of loadshedding and come back to this ****

Edit: Forgetting, two hour period included 20 minute tea break :censored: :censored:
 
Last edited:

RootingforEngland

Cricket Spectator
I reckon 5 day test cricket will be finished within 5 years. They might keep 2 or 3 select series at 5 days for a bit longer, but I'd guess the Ashes will be down to 4 days by the end of the decade if the changes aren't even bigger than that. I don't think the players are interested in playing 5 days any more.
 

RootingforEngland

Cricket Spectator
2 days wiped out by rain and this happens
You say that but I don't ever remember a test match like this, almost finished in 2 days. Maybe a couple of times on a pitch that's an absolute minefield (I think there was one mid 90s at edgbaston against WIndies), but not because the players just stand there and try to slog it and then hardly even look bothered when they're out. This isn't a test match, it's a farce.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
You say that but I don't ever remember a test match like this, almost finished in 2 days. Maybe a couple of times on a pitch that's an absolute minefield (I think there was one mid 90s at edgbaston against WIndies), but not because the players just stand there and try to slog it and then hardly even look bothered when they're out. This isn't a test match, it's a farce.
You're right about Edgbaston vs WI. And I'd forgotten all about it; 173 overs across 2 and a bit days in 1995.

Of course, the test that was actually finished in 2 days was against the same opposition at Leeds, five years later.



That being said, I really don't think that accusation can be levelled at SA in this test. Maybe one or two exceptions, but most of the dismissals have not been down to being over-aggressive. Nor, for the most part, England, although some of them have been.
 
Last edited:

andruid

Cricketer Of The Year
You're right about Edgbaston vs WI. And I'd forgotten all about it; 173 overs across 2 and a bit days in 1995.

Of course, the test that was actually finished in 2 days was against the same opposition at Leeds, five years later.



That being said, I really don't think that accusation can be levelled at SA in this test. Maybe one or two exceptions, but most of the dismissals have not been down to being over-aggressive. Nor, for the most part, England, although some of them have been.
I have a hunch that there might be another example or two from those late 90s early 2000s ashes where Australia would retain the urn in roughly 10 days of actual cricket.
 

wpdavid

Hall of Fame Member
I have a hunch that there might be another example or two from those late 90s early 2000s ashes where Australia would retain the urn in roughly 10 days of actual cricket.
I think you're right, but I don't think any of those matches were closer to 2 days than 3 days. The one I do remember was SA beating Zim in 2 days after the latter had lost most of their good players. Zim were skittled for not a lot, batting first and SA set up up a huge lead in no time at all before bowling them out for a 2nd time. It felt as if SA were making a point, and quite rightly too.
 

RootingforEngland

Cricket Spectator
You're right about Edgbaston vs WI. And I'd forgotten all about it; 173 overs across 2 and a bit days in 1995.

Of course, the test that was actually finished in 2 days was against the same opposition at Leeds, five years later.



That being said, I really don't think that accusation can be levelled at SA in this test. Maybe one or two exceptions, but most of the dismissals have not been down to being over-aggressive. Nor, for the most part, England, although some of them have been.
I've not watched most of it, but I did see some of the play during England's 1st innings collapse after tea and I thought it was awful. We've all seen worse collapses in terms of runs for wickets, but Brook's shot (no doubt under instruction) was just shocking, as yet again was the captain's innings.

Re my find of that 95 game, I managed to find an England tail yesterday as well of:

Fraser (ave 7)
Watkin (ave 5)
Such (ave 6)
Malcolm (ave 6)

80s/90s are my sweet spot!!
 

TT Boy

Hall of Fame Member
Did Zimbabwe see tea on day 2 when they lost to New Zealand in the 2000s? New Zealand scored 400+ on day 1 and then rolled out Zimbabwe twice the next day.
 

RootingforEngland

Cricket Spectator
I think you're right, but I don't think any of those matches were closer to 2 days than 3 days. The one I do remember was SA beating Zim in 2 days after the latter had lost most of their good players. Zim were skittled for not a lot, batting first and SA set up up a huge lead in no time at all before bowling them out for a 2nd time. It felt as if SA were making a point, and quite rightly too.
It was a shame about Zimbabwe cricket though, they'd been building a really competitive side iirc.
 

Top