a massive zebra said:
This is simply not true and easily disproven by facts. Murali has been humiliated far less often than Warne...
Warne
45 7 150 1 3.33 3rd Test v Ind in Aus 1991/92 at Sydney
22 2 107 0 4.86 1st Test v SL in SL 1992 at Colombo (SSC)
30 2 104 3 3.47 3rd Test v Pak in Pak 1994/95 at Lahore
30 7 122 1 4.07 1st Test v Ind in Ind 1997/98 at Chennai
42 4 147 0 3.50 2nd Test v Ind in Ind 1997/98 at Kolkata
15.5 2 70 1 4.42 3rd Test v WI in WI 1998/99 at Bridgetown
13 1 60 0 4.62 3rd Test v Ind in Aus 1999/00 at Sydney
34 3 152 1 4.47 2nd Test v Ind in Ind 2000/01 at Kolkata
42 7 140 2 3.33 3rd Test v Ind in Ind 2000/01 at Chennai
30 6 108 2 3.60 3rd Test v SA in SA 2001/02 at Durban
38 7 129 3 3.39 2nd Test v SL in Aus 2004 at Cairns
32 4 115 2 3.59 1st Test v Ind in Ind 2004/2005 at Nagpur
24 4 84 1 3.50 3rd Test v Pak in Aus 2004/05 at Sydney
19.2 2 77 1 3.98 3rd Test v WI in Aus 2005/06 at Adelaide
20 1 112 0 5.60 1st Test v BD in BD 2005/06 at Fatullah
Murali
36 6 123 1 3.42 1st Test v Pak in SL 1994 at Colombo
20 2 83 2 4.15 2nd Test v Pak in Pak 1995/96 at Faisalabad
54 3 224 2 4.15 1st Test v Aus in Aus 1995/96 at Perth
33 6 136 0 4.12 1st Test v NZ in NZ 1996/97 at Dunedin
25 2 96 2 3.84 2nd Test v Ind in SL 2001 at Kandy
30 3 102 2 3.40 Only Test v Aus in Aus 2005/06 at Sydney
36 4 128 3 3.56 3rd Test v Ind in Ind 2005/06 at Ahmedabad
and has a good record against all teams whereas Warne has failed dismally against India (43 wickets at 47.18).
Humiliation is an extreme word AMZ. After all the economy rates are - more less - consistent for both of them around 3.50 - 4.50 per over. And I have seen your figures and read your arguments before.
(And let's not get into it again, here)
But I should clarify what I mean - it is not a mere matter of statistics.
It is that, anecdotally speaking, I have seen Murali often go on the defensive when a batsman or batting side come after him. He tends to too easily retreat and go into a holding role where he is content to give the batsman his due while posting men back and concentrating on conceding as little as possible. A case in point was when Lara had the measure of him and more when WI toured Sri Lanka in 2002 - I think. Murali was reduced to and quite content to put a man back at long off and give Lara the single whilst he went about attacking other WI batsman. It is the same when he faces Stephen Fleming - he simply has no answer to him and looks like he does not either.
It is something I rarely, if ever, see Warne doing. Warne may be getting dominated but he does not fold back into his shell - instead he usually tries to attack and constantly tries to implement other plans to win the contest with the batsman, even if at times it does not work and he continues to come off second best.
This is what I meant by mental resilience and toughness under pressure.
Of course it may be said that Murali has to be strike and stock bowler, and therefore when batsman come at him and get a hold of him he has to relinquish his strike role and adopt a defensive stock role in the service of his team. There is some truth in this - but I believe that there is the other aspect as well, where he does retreat too easily when under the cosh unlike Warne who is usually in the contest come what may. Though again, where Warne is concerned he has the luxury of a stellar supporting cast and is not burdened with having to carry his team in almost each and every test.
There is the other point regarding cricketing nous as well. Warne has a better cricket brain. Even if his physical gifts do not get a batsman out Warne seems able to think of a plan on the field and implement it successfully. Murali however, when his repertoire of gifts and abilities is found lacking (as they sometimes are) is usually found lacking and is reduced to just bowling in hope and looking distinctly ordinary. Though as his range of abilities are arguably greater than Warne's this rarely happens.
Let me be clear here. I admire and respect Murali enormously, more than Warne, and furthermore - as a Sri Lankan by birth and a Tamil too, I have a lot of time for Murali. More time than I will ever have for Warne. However as much as I respect and admire Murali, for the reasons above and from my personal impressions gained whilst watching them both wheeling away, I believe Warne to
just shade Murali when it comes to bowling.