well then Warne should do that more often.marc71178 said:But that can be more than partially tempered by him bowling pretty much half the overs.
In this current game he bowled 33.5 out of the 89.5 overs in the first innings, and 46.5 out of the 107.5 overs in the second innings.
That means that in each innings he bowled for all but 10 overs from one end.
That is one thing Warne hasn't had to do (except for last summer and we all saw how many wickets he got when he did that)
he bowled some fantasic balls at times, but when he gets it wrong he gets them wrong big time.Craig said:How well did Dale Steyn bowl? Excluding that he took five wickets, because I know and see that, did he look pretty impressive with the ball or did the Sri Lankans get themselves out with poor shot selections?
dinu23 said:well then Warne should do that more often.
That's right !! Because If Murali was from SA, he would be playing for England.Langeveldt said:true, but if Murali was from SA I don't think he'd be so admired
Sanz said:That's right !! Because If Murali was from SA, he would be playing for England.
I dont on what basis do you categorise bowling performances has been humiliated by opposition batsmen, but based on memory of these specific matches, even though Warne's figures may be expensive he certainly wasn't humilated.a massive zebra said:This is simply not true and easily disproven by facts. Murali has been humiliated far less often than Warne...
Warne
42 7 140 2 3.33 3rd Test v Ind in Ind 2000/01 at Chennai
30 6 108 2 3.60 3rd Test v SA in SA 2001/02 at Durban
38 7 129 3 3.39 2nd Test v SL in Aus 2004 at Cairns
32 4 115 2 3.59 1st Test v Ind in Ind 2004/2005 at Nagpur
24 4 84 1 3.50 3rd Test v Pak in Aus 2004/05 at Sydney
19.2 2 77 1 3.98 3rd Test v WI in Aus 2005/06 at Adelaide
yea thats true, thats why arguing about these two is such a headache.marc71178 said:But that can be more than partially tempered by him bowling pretty much half the overs.
In this current game he bowled 33.5 out of the 89.5 overs in the first innings, and 46.5 out of the 107.5 overs in the second innings.
That means that in each innings he bowled for all but 10 overs from one end.
That is one thing Warne hasn't had to do (except for last summer and we all saw how many wickets he got when he did that)
What criteria did you use for that list because it doesn't appear that its been consistent...a massive zebra said:This is simply not true and easily disproven by facts. Murali has been humiliated far less often than Warne...
Bleh, I like Dean Jones' commentary. Hopefully, he wisens up and continues his broadcasting career.aussie said:what has Dean Jones done, hahaha.