• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** South Africa in Sri Lanka 2014

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
I came here to post that I think Amla is possibly the most suited batsman to 3 I have ever seen, but note Riggins has made a similar post. Even though Ponting and Dravid were obviously (for now) superior batsmen to Amla, almost feel like Amla's defend/consolidate/counter-attack gears are better than those 2.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Amla, like Kallis, has probs just realised that nowadays 4 is the new 3, and if you are/want to be ATG you go there.

Ponting never got the memo though.
 

91Jmay

International Coach
There is very little material difference between numbers 3/4, and batting positions in general are a tad overrated. Discuss

:ph34r:
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
There mightn't be a big difference between 3 and 4 but I love seeing a Dravidian style 3.

FWIW I don't see Amla in that category. His technique is not particularly traditional, his reputation is built around patience than traditionally tight top order batting technique. It's why I love Pujara so much.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
There mightn't be a big difference between 3 and 4 but I love seeing a Dravidian style 3.

FWIW I don't see Amla in that category. His technique is not particularly traditional, his reputation is built around patience than traditionally tight top order batting technique. It's why I love Pujara so much.
Best number 3s had counterattacking ability as well. Don (duh), Viv, Ponting.
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Unless you're saying Viv and Ponting could/would have been better suited lower down the order if you had Dravid available?
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
Unless you're saying Viv and Ponting could/would have been better suited lower down the order if you had Dravid available?
This is what I'm saying.

Or even if they wouldn't have been better, I just like those traditional style number 3s. They give me the warm fuzzies.
 

Riggins

International Captain
I came here to post that I think Amla is possibly the most suited batsman to 3 I have ever seen, but note Riggins has made a similar post. Even though Ponting and Dravid were obviously (for now) superior batsmen to Amla, almost feel like Amla's defend/consolidate/counter-attack gears are better than those 2.
Yeah, that ability to come out at 1 for **** all and be 80* at lunch is such a killer. One of those guys who you can bowl well to and look up at the scoreboard and he's 30 off 30. Remember talking to guys who were just clueless about how to bowl at him.
 

cnerd123

likes this
Amla's technique may not be water-tight, but given the form he's in I don't think that matters.

A counter-attacking number 3 will work great for South Africa since they have the likes of ABDV and Faf down the order to shut up shop if needed, and a pretty decent tail too. And Duminy is an incredibly talented batsman to have down at 5 or 6. Don't need a stodger up at 3.
 

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
The fact that we can mention AB de Villiers, one of the most aggressive, innovative and good limited-overs batsmen in history, as being able to "shut up shop" is a testament to how ridiculously good this bloke actually is.

Seriously, since he's started making the tough runs as well as skiing downhill, he's rocketed up in my estimations. Quality bat who, IMO, could well be an ATG by the end of his career.
 

akilana

International 12th Man
The fact that we can mention AB de Villiers, one of the most aggressive, innovative and good limited-overs batsmen in history, as being able to "shut up shop" is a testament to how ridiculously good this bloke actually is.

Seriously, since he's started making the tough runs as well as skiing downhill, he's rocketed up in my estimations. Quality bat who, IMO, could well be an ATG by the end of his career.
oh like he started making tough runs since last year eh
 

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
oh like he started making tough runs since last year eh
Where did I mention anything about last year? Dire posting.

lol at ab being called a downhill skier. he must have been poor against australia until the last tour..
Incidentally I always rated him (and my posts from multiple years ago would back that up), however there was a definite perception that he was a downhill skiier.
 

Dan

Hall of Fame Member
He's already an ATG in ODIs and 2 years away from it in Tests imo.
I'd call him an ATG already, myself, but I suspect that is very much a minority position. Honestly, in 2 years time he could be pushing for the final batting slot in my ATG team. I genuinely rate him that highly.
 

Maximas

Cricketer Of The Year
Different type of challenge as far as stonewalling goes for SA today than Adelaide or Johburg, good spinners bowling into the rough with the ball also turning sporadically off the main surface, not a flattish surface against pace dominant attacks, mind you the task doesn't seem as difficult given the time and wickets in hand, interested to see how they handle this
 

Top