kykweer.proteas
International Debutant
That is sinply incredible how AB got back in time
Not as incredible as the missed run-out chance!That is sinply incredible how AB got back in time
2/29 from 16 overs on a day where anyone else was either expensive (Dilruwan) or fairly unthreatening (Herath) sounds like he was a good selection. Kula is a new ball merchant who can keep it tight later, but Lakmal can do a similar job (without being quite as potent with a new ball tbf) at a better pace and is able to generate better bounce and can get reverse swing later on.Yeah but he doesn't have the ability to take a wicket, nor is he very controlled.
Kula is never going to be a world force and even if he's not having the best time of it right now he bowled ok whenever I was awake during the England series and he doesn't need to be amazing here, he just needs to lock down an end. He's not exactly quick or bouncy so on a slower Sri Lankan surface he should be bloody hard to get under and hit as well.
Eranga is your boy for reverse because he's actually dangerous with it.
I don't really understand where this attitude has come from given the last 6 months we've seen from him, he's improved a ****load, can be miserly and moderately dangerous on his day and has been consistently good since the start of the UAE series.I'm with Phlegm here. It's important that we end this CW trend of pretending Lakmal is any way useful, improving or a bowler of potential. He's not fit to carry Nuwan's kit, lets be real here, and it's hardly like Nuwan is a good Test bowler himself.
It's not in isolation if you consider the year he's had having. He's clearly changed as a bowler since the beginning of 2013 having spent a lot of time working with Vaas, His stats before this year reflect a bowler who was unable to either contain or strike with any consistency, whereas his stats this year show a bowler who can now contain effectively and make use of the moving ball to take wickets, having watched Lakmal on either side of that break I can certainly see why the stats show such an improvement.Nah Lakmal can get stuffed. Missed his second wicket but he's bowling ok at best here. Has spent his entire career being the oppositions 13th man and one handy 2/29 in isolation doesn't change that.
About to start investing in a caravan company as will be quids in soon...Nah Lakmal can get stuffed. Missed his second wicket but he's bowling ok at best here. Has spent his entire career being the oppositions 13th man and one handy 2/29 in isolation doesn't change that.
He will never ever ever ever average below 40 with the ball in test cricket. I'd put my house on it.
I like the batting order too providing de Villiers is actually going to keep when he's fully fit. I know there's a big concern about his workload, but when you bat him at five, don't let him captain and don't give him the gloves either, you're really making him much more of a bit part player than he should be.I simply don't understand the criticism the batting order is getting. AB did okay as an opener, but he has been infinitely better at #5 as a middle order bat. Amla has a great record at #3, but he deserves to make the #4 slot his own. Du Plessis has the perfect temperament for a #3.