Yes and yes. But he still won them the series.Didn't he blow away the tail at Wellington? (which has been far friendlier to spinners than the likes of Christchurch/Dunedin/Hamilton in recent years and wasn't that series majorly impacted by two rain affected draws? ).
Before that, I remember him tying down Raval (not the best player of spin, but still) who scored 80-odd and was pretty much keeping NZ together in that test, eventually got him stumped.Didn't he blow away the tail at Wellington? (which has been far friendlier to spinners than the likes of Christchurch/Dunedin/Hamilton in recent years and wasn't that series majorly impacted by two rain affected draws? ).
Sounds like a mythBefore that, I remember him tying down Raval (not the best player of spin, but still) who scored 80-odd and was pretty much keeping NZ together in that test, eventually got him stumped.
There was an article on cricinfo about a month ago.How lucky is Nicholls compared to Loosebuschange?
Kleinveldt vibes.Yes. But not anywhere near as consistent or good. Philander lite?
This was the article.There was an article on cricinfo about a month ago.
Adding up drops per test etc. Since Labuschagne's debut. And Labuschagne was the luckiest in world, by their statistical measures. Nicholls didnt even get mentioned in the article at all or figure in any of the lists.
Which was a but weird.
But it was only based on dropped catches.
Didnt go into being dismissed off a no-ball, or umpires calls etc.
Maybe it is just recency bias with Nicholls? Or maybe Henry is catching up fast in an outside lane. His 'run of luck' didn't really start until last summer.
lmao at Rahane being dropped the second most number of times but still averaging 20This was the article.
Labuschagne - lucky, and making the most of it
Who cashes in on fielders' gifts the most, who doesn't - this is what the numbers saywww.espncricinfo.com
i thought I had heard talk of Jansen and Olivia being 140s plus?Rabada to me has always been a bit like Dale Steyn in that with a brand new white ball going all out he might touch 150, but you mostly see him bowling in the 130s.
The other 3 just aren't express bowlers at all.
Rabada i feel hasn't done anything of note since ipl 2019 (bowling 154.4 km and wrecking a rampant scary in-form andre russell in a super over) and the odi wc match against aus in the same yearI have seen Rabada bowl quick but when he first started. Now he just ambles in and tries to nibble it. He used to hit the deck hard.
This is only a guess, and it's probably horrendously wrong and looks far worse on paper in my head, but Nipples has a run of low scores that he wouldn't have been dropped in. He was dropped 2-3-4 times in those knocks v WI and Pakistan (plus today by all reports) but didn't have many scores around that to be dropped in.There was an article on cricinfo about a month ago.
Adding up drops per test etc. Since Labuschagne's debut. And Labuschagne was the luckiest in world, by their statistical measures. Nicholls didnt even get mentioned in the article at all or figure in any of the lists.
Which was a but weird.
But it was only based on dropped catches.
Didnt go into being dismissed off a no-ball, or umpires calls etc.
Maybe it is just recency bias with Nicholls? Or maybe Henry is catching up fast in an outside lane. His 'run of luck' didn't really start until last summer.