Nah, no way. That went in then out. This went in, but the question was did it hit ground first?Looks just like the Strauss effort
But then you'll get cheating tossers (like de Villiers wrt the Strauss incident) who would abuse that, even if ideally it would be the solution everyone would prefer.Something has to be decided by world cricket whereby if a catch is claimed, then you take the word. Otherwise, this will continue ad infinitum.
thats what she said.That went in then out.
I agree take the fielders word if it is proven that he has claimed a 'dropped' catch then a 5 test ban & the stigma of being cheat to follow the player around.Something has to be decided by world cricket whereby if a catch is claimed, then you take the word. Otherwise, this will continue ad infinitum.
a 280 lead is 50/50 a lead over that starts to favour England.I think that England is in the box seat here.
he'd only abuse it once before he got banned for a good few games that would sort out those who wish to decieve. similar to the situation of player ssurrounding the ref in football if the ref gave a red to anyone who is not the captain then it would also soon stop.But then you'll get cheating tossers (like de Villiers wrt the Strauss incident) who would abuse that, even if ideally it would be the solution everyone would prefer.
incidents like that can just be dealt with by handing out suspensions.But then you'll get cheating tossers (like de Villiers wrt the Strauss incident) who would abuse that, even if ideally it would be the solution everyone would prefer.