• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** South Africa in England 2012

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Must be a good chance we lose 4-0 to India and I'd put Aus as favourites for next ashes with or without KP now.
Err I don't think Strauss' captaincy was anything exceptional and given what a millstone he was with the bat and in the field I don't think his retirement will have a detrimental impact on England. The only thing you arguably miss is the leadership, but England seemed to win games they were dominating and lose the closer ones. The tactics and so on is mostly dictated behind the scenes.
 

theegyptian

International Vice-Captain
Swann rested for the remaining ODI's. Swann's elbow must be in pieces to be rested mid-series like this with Eng 1-0 down. Probably also sheds some light on dropping him for the Headingly Test- possibly more resting than dropping.

Raises real concerns for the Indian tour for me regarding Swann. Might make it but doubt he goes to New Zealand.
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Swann rested for the remaining ODI's. Swann's elbow must be in pieces to be rested mid-series like this with Eng 1-0 down. Probably also sheds some light on dropping him for the Headingly Test- possibly more resting than dropping.

Raises real concerns for the Indian tour for me regarding Swann. Might make it but doubt he goes to New Zealand.
I said during the Tests he should have an op to fix it as soon as he can, if possible. He really is little use to us ATM. Would rather have Monty, Kerrigan or Tredwell. For ODIs Briggs is a certainty, with perhaps Keedy or Rashid as long-shots.
 

Stumpcam

U19 Captain
I said during the Tests he should have an op to fix it as soon as he can, if possible. He really is little use to us ATM. Would rather have Monty, Kerrigan or Tredwell. For ODIs Briggs is a certainty, with perhaps Keedy or Rashid as long-shots.
Yeah, I would go with Briggs for limited overs games too. He's the only one of the three to have bowled a maiden in the CB40 this season, although he's only bowled one. Has youth on his side and seems a very calm young man. Left arm though so could be viewed as too similar to Patel, although he bowls it much slower than Patel, I think.

2012 CB40 stats:

Keedy 68overs, 19wkts @ 19.83
Briggs 76overs, 17wkts @ 22.24
Rashid 56overs, 12wkts @ 25.17
 

Jarquis

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Both Taylor and Compton have been shoehorned into opening for the Lions in recent times. Wouldn't be adverse to Carberry if we weren't heading to the subcontinent. Would back him for runs in NZ/Eng/Aus.
 

Viscount Tom

International Debutant
Difference is though Compton's opened before.

Carberry should be in the team ahead of Root IMO the latter needs more time to develop and Carbs has done well on the domestic circuit for a few years.
 

Viscount Tom

International Debutant
Shahzhad really? Bopara!? Rashid?

Look I don't have a problem with Samit but Bopara has been given tons of opportunities at test level and never seems to do much when properly tests. Shahzad hasn't done enough to usurpe Finn and Rashid's gone backwards by and large since he last played, to drop Bairstow after he top scored for us at Lords is just daft.
 

MW1304

Cricketer Of The Year
Is Philander ever going to get a go in the test team? Has a quality record and clearly a good bat too.
I doubt it. He really does have an absolutely amazing record but he looked village with both bat and ball in his limited overs campaign, which probably shouldn't count for much but it will. On top of that he dropped some absolute sitters. I'd really like to see him picked just to satisfy my curiosity about his record, but whether it's actually a good idea or not is another matter.
Yeah I'd like to see how he goes, especially considering they don't have an obvious 1st change bowler performing. Never seen him play but 61 FC games at an average of 20 is quite astounding, so they may as well give him a go surely.
Can't believe I haven't dug these before. Basically what I am claiming here is that Philander got his chance because of me, it can't really be doubted. And PEWS WAC.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Can't believe I haven't dug these before. Basically what I am claiming here is that Philander got his chance because of me, it can't really be doubted. And PEWS WAC.
Haha, I was really keen to see him picked; I'd dig up my posts about it just before his debut if I could be bothered. I just really didn't think he ever actually would for the reasons I gave; it took a change in coach for him to be finally given a game.

People involved with CPL/CWPL will testify to how happy I was to see him go well too because my rating system had him at the second best bowler in the world just before his debut. There were no other uncapped players in the top 35 or so at the time.
 

MW1304

Cricketer Of The Year
Nah I know, that did come across in your post. I dug it because I remembered posting something about Philander before his debut wondering why he wasn't playing, but in reality I was someone who had no idea about the South African first class system, or Philander's bowling, asking the obvious question based on his crazy statistics.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Nah I know, that did come across in your post. I dug it because I remembered posting something about Philander before his debut wondering why he wasn't playing, but in reality I was someone who had no idea about the South African first class system, or Philander's bowling, asking the obvious question based on his crazy statistics.
Yeah, I'd been wanting to see him picked for a while at that point, so I was more or less just giving you the explanation for his non-selection that I'd gathered, rather than justifying it. I taste a lot of things on CW but if I had to taste the Test success of a long-term successful First Class bowler from a good domestic system I'd cease to be Cribbage.
 

Inferno

Cricket Spectator
I said during the Tests he should have an op to fix it as soon as he can, if possible. He really is little use to us ATM. Would rather have Monty, Kerrigan or Tredwell. For ODIs Briggs is a certainty, with perhaps Keedy or Rashid as long-shots.
Swann looked pretty good in the One dayers against Australia. Then again that doesn't mean much I guess considering how they are at the moment.
 

MW1304

Cricketer Of The Year
Swann's always good in ODI's, but then I don't think he needs to put as much into the ball to do his job. His Test form is definitely down, and we don't want to risk it deteriorating further because of his elbow.
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I know I'm just saying he should be in our long term plans for ODI's at least.

I agree, but I was really thinking what we could do short-term if he wanted an op, but it was poorly worded:)

I really want him back as an effective Test player, so would be happy to give up on his performances in the T/20 WC, to get it right. The Indian tour will be particularly embarrassing too, if he's not ripping it. TBH Monty possibly the better bowler in sub-continent too.
 

Top