Well....WW argument is that time was only asked twice during the day and that too at the time when the clock was stopped.....WindieWeathers' argument is along the same logical lines as a stopped clock still being right twice a day.
One could also argue South Africa need to raise their game to beat England. Their form over the last 8-9 months hasn't exactly been convincing.Well....WW argument is that time was only asked twice during the day and that too at the time when the clock was stopped.....
England will need to do more to beat SA
England also failed to win in Sri-lanka though, a place Australia had won in peviously!! , and lets be real about this, beating two fading forces is hardly major achievement.And it's a rubbish argument, based on England struggling in one series where their achilles heel was a) spin and b) Asian conditions. That's utterly meaningless when England will be faced with a seam dominant South African attack, and playing in their own conditions where they've won the last 7 series against everyone bar New Zealand and South Africa, and when their recent home record is played 24, won 17, drawn 5 (4 of which were ruined by weather), lost 2.
WindieWeathers' argument is along the same logical lines as a stopped clock still being right twice a day.
England have failed when properly tested of late and may fail again against SA?Relevance?
I was referring to the batting more than anything. That's why South Africa have lost odd Tests to some pretty ropey sides, not just lost but got hammered in them. Get England 4 down for next to nothing they'll still probably make 200, sometimes a lot more than that. South Africa have next to nothing left at 4 down.Are you on drugs mate?
SA doesn't "fight back"?
Against Australia last year in Cape Town, we were bowled out for less than 100.
What did we do?
Bowled them out for less than 50 and chased down the target with room to spare.
Against SL at Centurion at the end of last year we were 170 for 5, we scored more than 400 and won by an innings.
In the third Test of that series SL were 180 for 4, we bolwed them out for less than 250 and won by 10 wickets, just missing out on an innings victory.
And that is just our last home season.
And I would argue that we have serious depth.
JP Duminy is probably our reserve batsman, and in his last Test innings he scored a century.
England's number 6, or probably first batting reserve is Johnny Bairstow. Steyn, Philander, and Morkel are going to have him for breakfast.
But those tests have been completely different to anything we'll face against the Saffa's this summer. The last time we were tested in anything remotely similar conditions was against India and in Australia. We won both series crushingly.England have failed when properly tested of late and may fail again against SA?
The difference is though SA ain't a fading force like the two teams you mentioned above though!!...which is why it's gonna be very interesting to see how England perform in this series, the last really confident team you played (Pakistan) done a number on England.But those tests have been completely different to anything we'll face against the Saffa's this summer. The last time we were tested in anything remotely similar conditions was against India and in Australia. We won both series crushingly.
Ditto Australia.Nobody said India were a fading force before we smashed them.