Watching Gilchrist bat made me feel physically ill. Warner seems a natural successor. Throw in Hayden, Jacques, Katich- Australian lefties are a blight on cricket.
People who prefer the aesthetics of some batsmen to others?
Ah you're one of those...
HmmmmHe means one of those that don't appreciate diversity in the game.
As do most. But you can't argue Katich or Gilchrist looked like they had 'no ****in idea'.I certainly find it very annoying when a guy who consistently looks (to me) as though he has NFI nevertheless consistently scores run
Compared to Chanderpaul, Smith and Ganguly, they are stylistsWatching Gilchrist bat made me feel physically ill. Warner seems a natural successor. Throw in Hayden, Jacques, Katich- Australian lefties are a blight on cricket.
With Katich I actually just meant he is ugly to watchAs do most. But you can't argue Katich or Gilchrist looked like they had 'no ****in idea'.
You're talking about mindless sloggers.
Would seriously start something. Pathetic. Especially considering his series thus far and how Warner is dominating at the other end. Partnership anyone?When Marsh hit that last people in the office were like "Finally this guy decides to turn up" and one bloke commented "He's only in here because of his old man"
Hating on Shaun Marsh is so horrific.
Mitchell Johnson?Compared to Chanderpaul, Smith and Ganguly, they are stylists
Tbh, it's harder to name a classical left-handed batsman these days
Who carez, he muzt hit sixerz!!! lolWould seriously start something. Pathetic. Especially considering his series thus far and how Warner is dominating at the other end. Partnership anyone?
Smith and Chanderpaul look in control to me. Warner (and Gilchrist to me) just look like they are swishing merrily at everything with little regard for where it goes.Compared to Chanderpaul, Smith and Ganguly, they are stylists
Tbh, it's harder to name a classical left-handed batsman these days
Convention stated that a mis-hit big shot would more often than not lead to a batsman's dismissal. Gilchrist proved that not necessarily true. The guy was a revolutionary!With Gilchrist I certainly felt he looked like he had nfi. Never saw a guy get away with so many miss hit big shots.
ExactlyConvention stated that a mis-hit big shot would more often than not lead to a batsman's dismissal. Gilchrist proved that not necessarily true. The guy was a revolutionary!
How do you feel about Virender Sehwag?
Warn3r is gun 4 lyf.
Why do people make mock posts like this so often? I understand the theory behind them (obviously), but who is actually typing like this? What's the point in a parody if you're not parodying anyone?Who carez, he muzt hit sixerz!!! lol
So basically you're sort of like PrinceEWS, and want batsmen to play with the same (or similar) techniques?Exactly
Also find Sehwag dire
Seriously, whenever I watched Gilchrist I just felt like an unluckier guy (i.e. anyone bar him) would've been out 10 times already