I feel like a better measure would be the number of balls that are in line with the stumps but would have missed because they're too short. Much more useful statistic in conditions like England. An outside off stump line works, a short length doesn't.
I think apart from Anderson early they might have dialed into being just a fraction short of where they’ve needed to get the edge instead of going past it
Delusional
excellent. My lads are pushing for a win
was england really ever fit for humans to live in though
The only reason the keeper doesn't come up is he struggles to catch them standing back. He'd be no chance.Robinson bowling 78mph, should bring the keeper up for the Dibble dobbly (Carty's words for Boland's pace)
It was when we got rid of a few criminals to Australia
whoops meant "in" not "is"
How's the crusades working out for you
Glad you understand. Difference being of course is Anderson is the top seam wicket taker of all time, whereas Boland is merely cannon fodder and the Aussies agree as they dropped himRobinson bowling 78mph, should bring the keeper up for the Dibble dobbly (Carty's words for Boland's pace)
Heh.
Maybe yeah. Broad’s bowled some good ones. Not at their best but could’ve had a couple of wickets on another day. It’s really Robinson who looks a bit off the pace.
Badly. He started it now. It deserves a comeback ie “was England fit for humans”. Now that’s an interesting comment that has connotations if said about other countries
Let him just be a batsman and just bring in the better keeper. Obvs.
