Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Time for a good tongue-ing.
Jeez, the timeline delivered hereGlad you’re on board and reality has taken over.
Time for a good tongue-ing.
Jeez, the timeline delivered hereGlad you’re on board and reality has taken over.
Haha what can I say. After so many years I just can't deny it any longer.Jeez, the timeline delivered here
If defeat comes will you still be Burgey big bollocks ? Or slink away crying of cheating and conspiracy ?Glad you’re on board and reality has taken over.
Don't give him ideas.If defeat comes will you still be Burgey big bollocks ? Or slink away crying of cheating and conspiracy ?
Mate I know I haven’t posted at quite your rate, but I have made 90,000 plus of them and been on here since 2006, win or lose. You can safely assume that in the unlikely event that happens, I’ll still be here. Unless I’m at 35,000 feet or somewhere in the Adriatic and out of range.If defeat comes will you still be Burgey big bollocks ? Or slink away crying of cheating and conspiracy ?
Ya ****ing lost championThe build up to the 1st test was the same on here - the Aussies go in to full Billy Big Bollocks mode, predicting all sorts of carnage.
We had all the talk that we won't score quickly against their bowlers - but we did.
They're batting line up would murder our bowling - they didn't.
They would win on day 3 and be golfing on days 4 and 5 - they weren't.
Everyone on here knows that the 1st test was close and that England should have won.
But we didn't and we've licked our wounds and we're back for round 2.
And if we perform to our usual standard, it'll be another close game but hopefully, we'll get the breaks in this test that we didn't get in the 1st.
Only 90000. I’m over the 100000 on another forum and similarly started in 2006Mate I know I haven’t posted at quite your rate, but I have made 90,000 plus of them and been on here since 2006, win or lose. You can safely assume that in the unlikely event that happens, I’ll still be here. Unless I’m at 35,000 feet or somewhere in the Adriatic and out of range.
I’m with you here. A win would be sweet. I’m hoping a bit of cheating and controversy helps England win as that would be all the sweeterThe build up to the 1st test was the same on here - the Aussies go in to full Billy Big Bollocks mode, predicting all sorts of carnage.
We had all the talk that we won't score quickly against their bowlers - but we did.
They're batting line up would murder our bowling - they didn't.
They would win on day 3 and be golfing on days 4 and 5 - they weren't.
Everyone on here knows that the 1st test was close and that England should have won.
But we didn't and we've licked our wounds and we're back for round 2.
And if we perform to our usual standard, it'll be another close game but hopefully, we'll get the breaks in this test that we didn't get in the 1st.
I think if Boland does play, we'll find it trickier in this test, I don't see us scoring more than about 5 an over off him this time.I’m with you here. A win would be sweet. I’m hoping a bit of cheating and controversy helps England win as that would be all the sweeter
im praying that dibbly dobbly Boland plays. Six an over in this test off him
Always special when a player from your county makes his Ashes debut. We haven't had loads over the years. Yes I know he isn't Archer/Wood pace but can hit mid 80s when he's going and maybe touch 90s with odd ballTongue is an interesting bowler. He has pace
that Carey wicket is one of those some instances i mentioned. im just amused by this narrative of England domination all test and then them losing at the very end due to some freak miracle like it was Lara against Australia, Perera against South Africa or Stokes at Headingley. it wasn’t, if England dominated clearly like you claim they would have put Australia in the mud before even the Carey wicket instead of leaving a margin of 54 runs.When we got Carey out, Australia still needed 54 to win with only 2 wickets left.
All your main batsmen were out and even many Aussies on here were concerned pre match about the length of your tail.
We were clear favourites at that point so we can beat you on a flat pitch.
I'm not carried away about how we play etc or that we're gallant losers etc but I do think the 1st test showed that we can beat you.
I know you'll point to key players not performing, that you were under par.
But so were we.
You won the 1st test - well played. But it was a very close game and we go into the rest of the series in good shape.
so your chances of a win relied on Stokes pulling off an absolute blinder off a catch against the opponent’s 10?Exactly how it happened . If stokes had hung on to that catch off lyon, it would have been a different result
england being totally written off by the experts on here , who can’t get over the word bazball
it’s fascinating
Wood is injured dudeCan't believe they've picked Tongue. Wood or Potts would have been a better choice in my opinion.
I'm starting to worry.
Can hit mid 80s when he has got going,quickest delivery against Ireland was 91Wood is injured dude
if you pick Potts then you have 4 bowlers operating at the same speeds unless Potts bowls quicker than i know
is Tongue not quick?
Yeah there is a concern he may not have got through the 5 days,Stokes wants him fit for the third test at HeadingleyWood is injured dude
if you pick Potts then you have 4 bowlers operating at the same speeds unless Potts bowls quicker than i know
is Tongue not quick?